"Peace Bridge" between Armenian and Azerbaijani civil society encounters first challenge

The visit organised by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry for diplomats to Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding regions caused a stir in some quarters in Armenian society, and in turn a reaction in Azerbaijan. The controversy exposed the fragility of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process. For the diplomats, whose governments clearly recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, the controversy is a storm in a tea cup, but for some Armenians the loss of Karabakh remains a raw sensitive issue.

Caught in the eye of the storm has been the initiative "Bridge for Peace" which was set up in October of last year, by the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan, as an expression of civil society engagement in the peace process between them. The group has already organised several visits across the old conflict divide.

Another visit, involving thirty civil society Azerbaijani representatives to Armenia was due imminently, but according to reports, has now been postponed.

Both sides of "Bridge for Peace" have issued statements, and it is clear  that the initiative has encountered its first challnege. Yet observers believe that as long as the two governments keep supporting the initiative, it  will survive.

Here are the statements issued in Baku and Yerevan by "Bridge for Peace"

The Azerbaijani view:

The Azerbaijani Initiative Group "Bridge of Peace" expresses deep disappointment over the hostile reaction of the media and the unacceptable tone of public discourse in Armenia regarding the visit of the diplomatic corps to the Karabakh and East Zangezur regions of the Republic of Azerbaijan on September 11-12, 2026.

First of all, the visit of the diplomatic corps to the sovereign territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan should not in itself be a subject of controversy. In particular, verbal attacks against ambassadors and countries for participating in such a visit are disturbing and contradict Armenia's recognition of Azerbaijan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Azerbaijan and Armenia are currently in a post-conflict period, and both countries face the difficult task of overcoming decades of conflict. Through peace initiatives, we, as civil society representatives, with the support of the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia, are taking steps to facilitate the peace process, encourage dialogue, and support confidence-building measures.

The cultural heritage on the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan belongs to the Azerbaijani people and is under the protection of the state.

To ensure justice, cultural heritage issues must be discussed on the basis of reciprocity and open dialogue. To advance these goals, civil society representatives have created a platform for professional discussion of issues that form an integral part of the peace process agenda between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The peace process must not be allowed to come under pressure from revanchist forces, as this would seriously jeopardize further progress on the path to peace. We call on Armenian society to demonstrate a responsible approach to this issue and not succumb to the provocations of those with malicious intentions both in Armenia and abroad.

Farhad Mamedov
Kamalya Mamedova
Rusif Huseynov
Dilyara Efendieva
Ramil Iskenderli

The Armenian view:

The members of the Peace Bridge Initiative Armenia express their concern over recent developments related to the presentation of Armenian cultural heritage during the visit of diplomats to the Gandzasar medieval monastic complex and its adjacent museum.

At a time when significant progress has already been made in the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process, and when both societies are expected to continue moving, after decades of conflict, towards a new culture of relations, public statements and actions matter.

Recent developments deepen mistrust and create additional space for those who argue that dialogue is meaningless and that efforts to achieve peace are futile. Building peace requires difficult and honest conversations, attention to each other’s concerns, and a conscious effort to avoid actions that may reopen wounds or reinforce hostility.

We therefore call on all actors involved in the peace process to act with the responsibility required at this moment and to refrain from statements and actions that may be perceived as unconstructive.

Areg Kochinyan

Naira Sultanyan

Boris Navarsardyan

Narek Minasyan 

Samvel Meliksetyan
 

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Armenian and Azerbaijani members of Peace Bridge with Azerbaijani presidential advisor, Hikmet Hacijev

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament, during its plenary session in Strasbourg, approved the European Commission's proposal to apply a system of trade measures for "Made in Armenia" products, which means there will be a temporary elimination of customs duties on a wide range of products imported from Armenia to the European Union.   The proposal presented by the European Commission was adopted at the plenary session of the Council of Europe with 583 votes in favor, 49 against and 39 abstentions. According to the proposal, the European Union plans to eliminate customs duties on a number of Armenian goods for a period of two years. At the same time, it is planned to establish duty-free import quotas for eight types of Armenian agricultural products. These include grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches, and cucumbers. The draft also provides for safeguard mechanisms that will allow the European Union to intervene, if necessary, if increased imports from Armenia have a negative impact on European producers. This step is due to the restrictions imposed by Russia on a number of important Armenian export products since May 2026. They relate, in particular, to alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, fruits and vegetables, as well as their transit through Russian territory. According to the European Commission, these restrictions have disrupted Armenia's traditional supply chains and significantly limited the country's access to traditional export markets. The situation has had a particularly severe impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as agricultural producers, while creating challenges for Armenia's economic resilience. The EU sees the initiative as a temporary measure to support the Armenian economy and create additional opportunities for exporters to access the EU market. The next step for the proposal is formal approval by the EU Council. The regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Let us recall that on September 2, the Council of the European Union approved the proposal to establish temporary trade liberalization measures for Armenian products and sent the draft to the European Parliament for approval. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)