Outrage in Kazakhstan after Russian politicians appear to question the country's territorial integrity

Comments by several Russian politicians late last month have triggered a furious reaction in Kazakhstan.  

In their comments, Vyacheslav Nikonov and Yevgeny Fedorov - two members of the Russian State Duma - characterized Kazakhstan's current territory as a "gift" from Russia.

It started on December 10, when Vyacheslav Nikonov, the chairman of the Education and Science Committee in the Duma, stated in a speech on Russian state television, that Kazakhstan "did not exist before" and described a lot of its "territory as a "great gift from Russia and the Soviet Union". Following the speech, the Russian activist movement Patriot placed a banner at the Embassy of Kazakhstan in Moscow saying: "North Kazakhstan is Russian territory".

Duma member, Yevgeny Fyodorov, joined the fray soon after, saying that Kazakhstan "has leased its territory from the Soviet Union. He insisted on "reclaiming the territories" and called for the annulment of "illegal decisions taken in 1991" after the collapse of the former Soviet Union and to investigate how those decisions were taken.

Public opinion in Kazakhstan has been outraged by the comments of the Russian politicians. In interviews with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Kazakhs demanded an apology from Russia for the remarks they said were aimed at stirring up separatism in their country. In the village of Dolmatovo, the northernmost village in the province of North Kazakhstan, citizens said they are aware of Russian legislators' comments and the anger they caused. 

The President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev rejected the assertion that any Kazakh territory was  a "gift from Russia", and said that such "provocative" comments were intended to "spoil" relations between the two neighbours. The president said that Kazakhs should "resist provocative actions by some foreign citizens" trying to "spoil neighbourly relations". 

 

"Nobody from outside gave Kazakhs this large territory as a gift,” Toqaev wrote in an article published in local newspapers on January 5. Kazakhstan must "stand against provocative actions by some foreign citizens" who are trying to "spoil neighborly relations," he said, without mentioning directly the two Russian politicians.

Since achieving independence in 1991 Kazakhstan has tried to keep very good relations with Russia. It is a member of both the Eurasia Economic Union and the Collective Security Treaty Organisation both of which are Russia-led and serve as an umbrella for Russian hegemony over the former Soviet states. It is therefore somewhat baffling why Russian politicians have all of a sudden started questioning Kazakh territorial integrity. Given the way things work in Moscow it is unlikely that the politicians were doing so without a nod from the Kremlin. The question is why? and Why now?

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

 photo: President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev at a press conference in June 2020 (picture courtesy of the press service of the Kazakh presidential administration)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.