Moscow statement distances Russia from CSTO comments on Karabakh

The Russian Foreign Ministry on Friday (30 December) issued a short terse statement on the ongoing incidents on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, urging the sides to abide by the cease-fire. The statement also distanced the Russian position from the comments of CSTO Secretary-General the previous day.

In its statement the Russian Foreign Ministry stated,

"According to information, clashes have occurred on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. Casualties are reported among the troops on both sides. We express our condolences to the families who lost their loved ones. We urge the parties to continue adhering strictly to their obligations to maintain the ceasefire and immediately take all necessary steps to stabilize the situation. 

As for the statement of Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the position of the CSTO member states on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is clearly expressed in their joint statement in Yerevan on October 14, 2016".

Earlier, the Azerbaijani government strongly criticised comments made by CSTO Secretary General Nikolay Bordyuzha, and particularly his reference to the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. In its statement on Thursday the CSTO Secretariat said that it was concerned about information it had received about an incident "near the Chinari region of Armenia".

"We assess such actions in the territory of a CSTO member state as a provocation, especially against the backdrop of the quite serious incident in the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, in April of this year, with the use of heavy weapons and military equipment.

Considering the efforts launched by the leaders of the two [conflicting] sides as well as of some [other] states, it seemed that the Karabakh conflict settlement process finally would be more active. However, the information being recently received from the region, [and] about the violation of the ceasefire agreements, especially the December 29 incident which has caused the death of military servicemen, gives rise to serious concern".

In its response on Friday, the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry claimed that Bordyuza had distorted the essence of the incident by alleging that it took place on the territory of Armenia. and that reference to the "Nagorno-Karabakh Republic" was an attempt to question the territorial integrity, sovereignty and internationally recognised borders of Azerbaijan.

"This irresponsible statement made by the CSTO secretary general undermines the negotiation process on the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group, as well as runs contrary to the fundamental principles of relations with other member states of the organization supporting Azerbaijan's sovereignty and territorial integrity," the ministry added. The Azerbaijani foreign ministry rejected Bordyuzha's statement, calling on other CSTO countries to comment on it.

On their part, Armenian officials and commentators have welcomed Bordyuzha's statement describing it as significant.

Commonspace.eu political editor said that apart from the military situation on the ground the current situation is clearly starting to cause stresses within Russian led organisations such as the CSTO and the Eurasian Economic Union, and there have been already a number of examples of this in the last year. What has happened in recent days, on the diplomatic, as well as the military fronts, escalates the problem. Whilst Armenia is a full member of both the CSTO and the EEU, Azerbaijan is a member of neither. But a number of CSTO and EEU member states are reluctant to be dragged into a pro-Armenian position. It is not clear if the CSTO statement on Thursday was trying to send a message, or was simply a badly drafted statement, but it has certainly touched a raw nerve. On its part, Moscow has to walk on a thin line in order both to keep solidarity within the institutions that it patronises, and to safeguard its own interests which at the moment are best served by not alienating Azerbaijan, whilst keeping Armenia firmly in the fold. This is yet another example of how the Karabakh conflict has become a significant regional and international problem, and can no longer be regarded as a parochial dispute."

source: commonspace.eu with APA (Baku) news.am (Yerevan) and other agencies

photo: The Russian Foreign Ministry building in Moscow (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Mystery surrounds the crash of a Turkish airline in Georgia which resulted in the death of 20 Turkish Airforce personnel

Mystery surrounds the crash of a Turkish airline in Georgia which resulted in the death of 20 Turkish Airforce personnel

​ Twenty Turkish Airforce personnel died when a military plane crushed on the Georgian side of the Azerbaijan - Georgia border on Tuesday (11 November). The C130 took off from Ganja and was heading to Merzifon, transporting service members that had participated in Azerbaijan's Victory Day celebrations. Half an hour after takeoff, the aircraft lost altitude and broke apart in mid-air over a mountainous area on the Georgian border. Lockheed C130 Hercules have been in service with Turkey since the 1960s and are considered among the most reliable in their class. However, some of these aircraft are 50–60 years old. In October, the Turkish Ministry of Defense announced plans to replace them with new C130J Super Hercules models, with deliveries expected to begin in the coming years. All aircraft fragments have already been collected for technical examination. The cause of the crash has not yet been officially determined. A Turkish expert and retired military officer Coşkun Başbuğ noted on CNN Türk, a technical malfunction "should be ruled out" as the cause of the crash. "Various possibilities should be considered, but the first thing to consider is that the C-130 is a time-tested military transport aircraft, the last known incident involving which occurred in 1982." "A technical malfunction should be ruled out as the cause of the crash. The same applies to weather conditions, as the relevant authorities would have reported bad weather. The remaining theories include a mid-air collision, sabotage, or an attack," he emphasized. Former Turkish Armed Forces Logistics Commander and retired Army General Erdoğan Karakuş stated in an interview with Turkish television that although the C-130 aircraft are old, they have undergone a complete modernization in Turkey, and their technical condition is thoroughly inspected before each flight. The Turkish Air Force is expected to operate the C-130 aircraft until 2040. ​

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Mystery surrounds the crash of a Turkish airline in Georgia which resulted in the death of 20 Turkish Airforce personnel

Mystery surrounds the crash of a Turkish airline in Georgia which resulted in the death of 20 Turkish Airforce personnel

​ Twenty Turkish Airforce personnel died when a military plane crushed on the Georgian side of the Azerbaijan - Georgia border on Tuesday (11 November). The C130 took off from Ganja and was heading to Merzifon, transporting service members that had participated in Azerbaijan's Victory Day celebrations. Half an hour after takeoff, the aircraft lost altitude and broke apart in mid-air over a mountainous area on the Georgian border. Lockheed C130 Hercules have been in service with Turkey since the 1960s and are considered among the most reliable in their class. However, some of these aircraft are 50–60 years old. In October, the Turkish Ministry of Defense announced plans to replace them with new C130J Super Hercules models, with deliveries expected to begin in the coming years. All aircraft fragments have already been collected for technical examination. The cause of the crash has not yet been officially determined. A Turkish expert and retired military officer Coşkun Başbuğ noted on CNN Türk, a technical malfunction "should be ruled out" as the cause of the crash. "Various possibilities should be considered, but the first thing to consider is that the C-130 is a time-tested military transport aircraft, the last known incident involving which occurred in 1982." "A technical malfunction should be ruled out as the cause of the crash. The same applies to weather conditions, as the relevant authorities would have reported bad weather. The remaining theories include a mid-air collision, sabotage, or an attack," he emphasized. Former Turkish Armed Forces Logistics Commander and retired Army General Erdoğan Karakuş stated in an interview with Turkish television that although the C-130 aircraft are old, they have undergone a complete modernization in Turkey, and their technical condition is thoroughly inspected before each flight. The Turkish Air Force is expected to operate the C-130 aircraft until 2040. ​