Lubyanka accuses west of stirring ethnic conflict in the South Caucasus

The crisis in the South Caucasus took another strange twist on Wednesday (18 November), after the Head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (FSB) accused the United States and Europe of inciting ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. Sergei Naryshkin's intervention from FSB headquarters in Lubyanka comes after the FSB was given a role by Russian president Vladimir Putin in the new "humanitarian centre" that he created in support of its new military force in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

Russia's TASS news agency quoted Naryshkin as saying

"According to the information we have, some Western countries are inciting Armenian and Azerbaijani nationalists to discredit and disrupt the ceasefire agreements. They are trying to convince Armenians that the peace in Nagorno-Karabakh is a defeat for Yerevan. They are injecting ideas about the need for a ‘war to the victorious end.' On the other hand, Azerbaijanis are told that the Kremlin ‘stole their victory' when the Azerbaijani army was a step away from capturing Stepanakert.

Leading NATO countries are trying to hide their irritation at the agreement on the Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire between Azerbaijan and Armenia reached with Russia's active participation. The United States and its allies are vexed that the war was stopped through Moscow's mediation. The thing is that it essentially reduced their longstanding work to push Russia out of Transcaucasia to zero.

 Neither Washington nor the ‘United Europe' want to come to terms with the existing balance of power in the region. They couldn't come up with anything better than trying to rekindle animosity between the  nations of Azerbaijan and Armenia to dismantle it. These actions serve as yet more proof that the US and its European friends again pursue their goals at the expense of the interests of ordinary  people, in  this case, Azerbaijanis and Armenians. Americans and Europeans are not worried that their provocations can lead to new bloodshed and plunge the region into a severe military conflict."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that this latest twist in developments around Nagorno-Karabakh is very telling of where Russia is going with its actions.

For a long time it has been obvious that Russia's objectives in its involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were far from benign. First it flooded the region with billions of dollars worth of military equipment, arming the two sides to the teeth; it then sidelined the other mediators in the conflict; then out of a hat it produced a peace formula, that included the deployment of a large Russian military force. But perhaps it was the establishment of the "inter-agency humanitarian response centre", with the FSB playing an important role in it, announced by president Putin on 13 November, that somehow gave the game up. Such a centre was not mentioned in the 10 November agreement, and was a unilateral Russian action. With the FSB involved we know what to expect."

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.