Lubyanka accuses west of stirring ethnic conflict in the South Caucasus

The crisis in the South Caucasus took another strange twist on Wednesday (18 November), after the Head of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (FSB) accused the United States and Europe of inciting ethnic conflict between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. Sergei Naryshkin's intervention from FSB headquarters in Lubyanka comes after the FSB was given a role by Russian president Vladimir Putin in the new "humanitarian centre" that he created in support of its new military force in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

Russia's TASS news agency quoted Naryshkin as saying

"According to the information we have, some Western countries are inciting Armenian and Azerbaijani nationalists to discredit and disrupt the ceasefire agreements. They are trying to convince Armenians that the peace in Nagorno-Karabakh is a defeat for Yerevan. They are injecting ideas about the need for a ‘war to the victorious end.' On the other hand, Azerbaijanis are told that the Kremlin ‘stole their victory' when the Azerbaijani army was a step away from capturing Stepanakert.

Leading NATO countries are trying to hide their irritation at the agreement on the Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire between Azerbaijan and Armenia reached with Russia's active participation. The United States and its allies are vexed that the war was stopped through Moscow's mediation. The thing is that it essentially reduced their longstanding work to push Russia out of Transcaucasia to zero.

 Neither Washington nor the ‘United Europe' want to come to terms with the existing balance of power in the region. They couldn't come up with anything better than trying to rekindle animosity between the  nations of Azerbaijan and Armenia to dismantle it. These actions serve as yet more proof that the US and its European friends again pursue their goals at the expense of the interests of ordinary  people, in  this case, Azerbaijanis and Armenians. Americans and Europeans are not worried that their provocations can lead to new bloodshed and plunge the region into a severe military conflict."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that this latest twist in developments around Nagorno-Karabakh is very telling of where Russia is going with its actions.

For a long time it has been obvious that Russia's objectives in its involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were far from benign. First it flooded the region with billions of dollars worth of military equipment, arming the two sides to the teeth; it then sidelined the other mediators in the conflict; then out of a hat it produced a peace formula, that included the deployment of a large Russian military force. But perhaps it was the establishment of the "inter-agency humanitarian response centre", with the FSB playing an important role in it, announced by president Putin on 13 November, that somehow gave the game up. Such a centre was not mentioned in the 10 November agreement, and was a unilateral Russian action. With the FSB involved we know what to expect."

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular