Israel launches an air campaign targeting Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure

On Friday (13 June), a series of powerful explosions were heard and seen across Iran, following a large-scale Israeli air campaign targeting the country's military infrastructure. In a prerecorded video released early on Friday morning, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued that the strikes were aimed at nuclear infrastructure and ballistic missile factories inside Iran. According to Netanyahu, the strikes were necessary to delay what he described as an imminent nuclear threat.

Iranian state media reported that several senior military figures had been killed or seriously injured, including the commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Hossein Salami; the Armed Forces chief, Mohammad Bagheri; and the nuclear scientists Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi and Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani.

In an immediate response, Iran launched more than 100 drones towards Israeli territory. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, condemned the strikes as a “crime” and warned Israel to expect “severe punishment”. A state of emergency has been declared in Israel, with sirens sounding nationwide, airports closed and public activities limited.

The U.S. government has stated that it was not involved in the air operation, but has emphasised that its forces in the region remain protected. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged Iran not to extend its aggression towards American personnel.

Source: commonspace.eu with Al Jazeera and other agencies.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.