Human Rights and Conflicts

The Hague Conversations on Conflict are a series of discussions, lectures, workshops and networking events launched by LINKS Europe in association with The Hague Humanity Hub, in June 2019. Their aim is to provide a forum where the changing nature of war and conflict can be analysed and assessed, together with the responses of international society. The third conversation took place on Thursday, 31 October at The Hague Humanity Hub and focused on the theme Human rights and conflicts". The event was organised in collaboration, and with the support of, Security and Human Rights Monitor. 

You can download a full report of the event here

Over the course of the last century, and particularly after the experience of World War II, the world has increasingly recognised the vital importance of human rights and sought to embed them within national and international legal systems and the global international order. There is now, an increased recognition that, if ignored, human rights violations destabilise societies, fracture communities, and perpetuate the feelings of injustice that inevitably lead to and perpetuate violent conflict. Conversely, when embedded in policy, promotion and consideration for human rights can strengthen both conflict prevention and conflict resolution processes. There remain, however, many aspects of the debate that are still hotly debated and contested. Do you address the rights of minorities through collective rights or individual human rights? When is military humanitarian intervention justified, and who should authorise it? How do we aid non-governmental humanitarian organisations working in areas controlled by extremist groups without jeopardising national security? Should we offer immunity to those committing gross human rights violations if it means ending conflict and further abuses, or does this undermine the primacy of humanitarian law?

The third in The Hague Conversations on Conflict series, held on the 31st of October 2019, addressed the topic of human rights and conflict prevention and resolution. We were delighted to welcome to our panel Dr Nienke van der Have, a senior legal expert and author of the book, ‘The Prevention of Gross Human Rights Violations Under International Human Rights Law’; Ambassador Piet de Klerk, Chairman of the Netherlands Helsinki Committee and former Dutch Human Rights Ambassador; and Fulco van Deventer, Deputy Director and Co-founder of the Human Security Collective (HSC) and Associate Fellow at the International Center for Counter Terrorism (ICCT). In addressing the topic, the panellists and an engaged audience of around eighty participants explored current and future considerations for policy makers and conflict practitioners, looking not only at how to ensure the respect for human rights within conflict prevention, mediation and resolution, but also how human rights can be used to improve practices and reduce conflict globally. 

A full report of the event is available to download here

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)