How is your Esperanto?

William Murray writes for commonspace.eu that expanding our linguistic horizons is a good idea in the current period and not nearly as daunting as we might think.

As the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates that we all stay at home, it is a great opportunity to acquire a new language. Under normal circumstances, it can be difficult to squeeze daily language learning into a tiring schedule of work and commuting, not to mention the task of motivating oneself. On the most basic level, language learning takes time, commitment and rigorous repetition. But during the current COVID-19 pandemic, for most, time is in abundant supply; and mental health experts continue to emphasise the importance of establishing a daily structure and giving oneself a sense of purpose when most normal activity has been put on hold [1].

It is very common for people across Europe to speak more than one language. Studies have shown that over half the EU population are able to hold a conversation in a language other than their own, with this exceeding 90% in certain countries - the Netherlands, Lithuania and Latvia, amongst others [2]. Multilingualism is, after all, understood to be one of the founding principles of the European Union, embodying the EU's motto, 'United in Diversity' [3].

However, in certain countries on the European continent, the ability to speak more than one language is considerably ­­­lower than others. This could be put down to a lack of belief in one's own ability - in the same way that a trilingual person has little doubt that through hard work and commitment, they could capably learn a fourth or fifth language; monolingual individuals see the task of learning an entire second language as an impossibly daunting prospect. In largely multilingual countries, it is much more difficult for individuals to feel that learning an additional language is impossible when so many of their peers have managed to do so.

Language learning is difficult but not nearly as impossible as it may seem. Too often monolingual people tout the same excuse, which they honestly believe to be the case - that the window for learning a second language has long since passed and that they only wish they had done so when they were younger. In his widely-acclaimed book, Fluent Forever, Opera singer-turned-linguist, Gabriel Wyner, refers to the idea that children are immeasurably better at learning languages as a myth - "Kids seem to succeed at language learning where adults fail, but that's only because they get so much more input that we do". Wyner does concede that children have a few innate advantages - such as a lesser concern for making mistakes and a blank canvas on which to build - but that these are things that can be overcome as adults by learning languages with confidence and using certain techniques that through repetition build natural linguistic foundations. "Fortunately for us, the [language learning] machine in [children's] heads never stops working. If we want to learn a new language, we just need to know how to use it," Wyner claims [4].

But why should we learn more languages? Especially for those native to English-speaking countries, knowledge of the lingua franca makes it very easy to get by, which seems to undermine the value of additional language learning. But language is not merely a tool for transactional exchanges of information, but a way of forming genuine human connections and thoroughly understanding other people at the most basic level. Nelson Mandela is said to have stated, 'if you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his own language, that goes to his heart'. Additionally, there is more than an element of truth in Goethe's claim that, "a man who has no acquaintance with foreign languages knows nothing of his own." [5] Many studies have shown that by learning additional languages, one will gain a much better understanding of their native language, through improved communication skills and a further understanding of basic linguistic structures [6].

There is no doubt that many of you are reading this in your second, third or umpteenth language, but the message remains the same. Why not challenge yourself to learn something unfamiliar such as a coding language? Whilst the nuances of communication between human beings and computers are entirely different, the structure and purpose that committing to a daily task with a tangible development track will give us is very likely to make our time in isolation a lot more bearable.

With all this time on our hands and the need for us all to keep a solid daily routine for our mental health, language learning is a valuable and rewarding hobby for all of us to consider. In addition, learning a new skill can help each of us to come out of this period developmentally at a net positive.

Source: William Murray, Project Officer and Coordinator at LINKS Europe, for commonspace.eu

Featured references: 

[1] WHO Europe - 'Mental health and psychological resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic': http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/mental-health-and-psychological-resilience-during-the-covid-19-pandemic 

[2] The Guardian - 'Most Europeans can speak multiple languages. UK and Ireland not so much': https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/sep/26/europeans-multiple-languages-uk-ireland

[3]  The European Commission - 'About multilingualism policy': https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/multilingualism/about-multilingualism-policy_en

[4] G. Wyner ­- 'Fluent Forever': https://fluent-forever.com/book/

[5] J.W. Goethe - 'Maxims and Reflections': https://www.gutenberg.org/files/33670/33670-h/33670-h.htm

[6] The Alberta Teacher's Association - 'Literature Review on the Impact of

Second-Language Learning': https://www.caslt.org/files/media/news/Lit-review-Impact-L2-Learning.pdf

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)