Hotline established between the Ethiopian government and the Tigray forces

The African Union’s chief mediator Olusegun Obasanjo said on Monday (7 November) that the Ethiopian government and the Tigray rebel forces have established a telephone hotline following a truce struck last week.

This comes after the two parties agreed on 2 November to end any hostilities and call a ceasefire to a war that has already killed thousands and displaced millions.

Representatives of Ethiopia’s government and the Tigray regional forces met in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, to discuss how the ceasefire should be implemented. Obasanjo argued that the hotline is the first sign of progress towards peace. The hotline will address any flare-ups in fighting and coordinate disengagements with both sides, recognising that communication is key to stop the fighting. The African Union further added that the meeting was expected to reach an agreement on ending the fighting, restoration of services in the Tigray region, and the provision of humanitarian aid. Although the hotline is a positive step towards peace, the implementation of a ceasefire will be tough as there are still unsettled political and territorial disputes.

The self-proclaimed Tigray People’s Liberation Front pledged to disarm their fighters within 30 days under the agreement. Officials are also hoping for a panel of experts led by the African Union to monitor the compliance of the ceasefire this week.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies
photo: Olusegun Obasanjo, the African Union chief mediator at talks between the Ethiopian government and Tigray forces, at an event in Addis Ababa, on February 5, 2022. Eduardo Soteras/AFP, via Al Jazeera.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

The G7 summit, a gathering of major world leaders meeting at Kananaskis, in the Canadian Rockies, has concluded with a joint leaders statement urging a "de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza". It stopped short of calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The leaders' statement, published as US President Trump left Canada, said Israel had a right to defend itself, and that Iran was a source of terror that should not have a nuclear weapon. According to the BBC, its call for a resolution of the crisis that led to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East amounted to a diplomatic compromise that preserved G7 unity but watered down the statement's impact.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

Leaders urge 'de-escalation' as G7 Summit in Canada is overshadowed by Middle East conflict

The G7 summit, a gathering of major world leaders meeting at Kananaskis, in the Canadian Rockies, has concluded with a joint leaders statement urging a "de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza". It stopped short of calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The leaders' statement, published as US President Trump left Canada, said Israel had a right to defend itself, and that Iran was a source of terror that should not have a nuclear weapon. According to the BBC, its call for a resolution of the crisis that led to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East amounted to a diplomatic compromise that preserved G7 unity but watered down the statement's impact.