Georgia's crazy opinion polls

As Georgia prepares to go to the polls on Saturday, 8 October, questions have again arisen about the reliability of opinion polls, and the possible manipulation of opinion and exit polls by different political forces.

The problem is not new. Opinion polls ahead of the 2012 parliamentary elections proved not only to be unreliable, but outright misleading.

Opinion polls by the American National Democratic Institute ahead of the elections held on 1 October 2012 hugely underestimated the support for the Georgian Dream coalition. In its report dated 7 September 2012 NDI showed Georgian Dream support at 12% (based on respondents likely to vote) against the projected support for the United National Movement at 37% - this according to a poll conducted shortly before the elections. In the election itself the Georgian Dream coalition got 54.97% whilst the UNM got 40.34%. Needless to say the difference between the poll and the actual election result goes far beyond any conceivable margin of error.

The problem persists. Opinion polls published in recent days give completely different pictures.

On 1 October, the pro opposition TV station Rustavi 2 reported on its website:

"According to the GFK conducted research, the National Movement is ahead of Georgian Dream in ratings. When asked which party they would vote for, if they were to take part in the parliamentary elections, the results were as follows - the United National Movement -26%; Then comes the Georgian Dream 25.4%. Just one week before the election, commissioned by Rustavi2 the GFK company conducted public opinion research and published results of the third pre-election poll."

At almost the same time Imedi TV, a pro Georgian Dream station gave a completely different picture. As reported by agenda.ge on 30 September:

"The poll, commissioned by Imedi TV and conducted by the American research firm JPM revealed the current ruling party would win the elections. The Imedi TV poll indicated the current ruling party had the most support from voters. 

The survey asked people who they will vote for. The results showed:  Georgian Dream-Democratic Georgia - 32.7 %; United National Movement - 12.8%"

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "the unreliability of the opinion polls in the past, and the continued exaggerated discrepancies ahead of next Saturday's vote should make political observers very wary on basing their assessments on these polls. As could be seen in recent polls in Britain (ahead of both the General elections and the Brexit referendum), opinion polls are imprecise even in the most sophisticated democracies. In a situation like Georgia they must, at best, be taken with a pinch of salt. What will matter will be the result of the election that will be released by the Central Elections Commission in the early hours of Sunday morning. The Georgian people need to be reassured that it is their vote that matters, not what the opinion polls say".

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Screenshot from a report on opinion poll findings on one of Georgia's tv stations

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)