Chad talks in Doha hit a snag before they even got started

Talks between the Chad's central government and Chadian politico-military groups began on Sunday, 13 March in Doha with the aim of putting an end to the ongoing rebellion and facilitate the holding of early elections.

This dialogue is a crucial step towards the reconciliation promised by the Chadian transitional authorities, whose inclusive national dialogue planned for May in N'Djamena would be meaningless without the presence of all the rebel groups.

Indeed, this landlocked African country is looking for a way to ease the divisions that have accentuated since President Idriss Déby - in power for 30 years - died fighting jihadist rebels on the northern front on 20 April 2021. On the same day, his son, Mahamat Idriss Déby Itno, proclaimed himself head of the Transitional Military Council (CMT), made up of 15 army generals, before promising to draft a new constitution and to hold free and democratic elections within 18 months, a deadline that can be extended once.

The 44 Chadian opposition groups invited to Doha demanded the release of prisoners of war, the return of confiscated property and a general amnesty as conditions for the peace talks. The military government announced that it had already released hundreds of prisoners and granted amnesty to several rebel leaders.

As the talks began on Sunday morning, the military group FACT - the Front for Change and Concord in Chad responsible for the death of former president Idriss Deby Itno - decided to boycott the opening ceremony. The six representatives of the group criticized the lack of inclusiveness in the meeting, the lack of mediation between the Chadian authorities and the military groups, as well as the excessive number of politico-military groups present at the meeting.

According to FACT, Qatar should play the role of mediator rather than simply facilitator, and regretted not being associated with the elaboration of the agenda during the pre-dialogue discussions. Finally, they argued that the disproportionate number of politico-military groups was a strategy to dilute the voice of the main armed groups in the negotiations.

To address this initial hurdle, Qatar initially confirmed its impartial position as mediator, while making two proposals to bring the FACT group back to the negotiating table. These were to suspend the work for three days to allow the armed groups to consult each other, and for each side to select a dozen representatives to guide and facilitate the discussion.

On Sunday, Chadian Prime Minister Albert Pahimi Padacké reminded participants that "peace requires more courage and maturity than war".

Source: CommonSpace.eu with RFI (Île-de-France) and Al Jazeera (Doha)
Picture: Chad Peace negotiations ; Twitter: @africanews

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.