Busting fake news. Know your facts!

As the world tackles the COVID-19 pandemic, we continue to be faced with fake news. William Murray unwraps some of the false advice that is going around in this public service update for commonspace.eu.

With all of the information being shared about how to best combat the coronavirus, it is sometimes difficult to know what can be trusted. This is especially concerning at present as people are under a lot of strain and may want to believe tales of 'quick fixes' and panaceas. Although misinformation is not necessarily being spread maliciously, there continues to be a flurry of fake advice - this is at best, unhelpful; and at worst, outright dangerous. In order to combat some of this information, it's important to know what we can trust, and must all respectfully shut down information we know to be wrong. 

Here are three significant points of disinformation that have been making the rounds:

Claim: Drinking alcohol can prevent the coronavirus

Reality: Not only is this objectively wrong but it is also a very dangerous claim

Although false, this claim continues to be spread, which isn't helped by the fact that it was jokingly touted by the Serbian President last month [1]. Alcohol lowers the body's immune system, and thus, hampers its ability to fight off the virus. Indirectly, intoxication through alcohol also lowers people's inhibitions, which can easily lead to less care being taken to over proper protective measures [2]. This mistruth is now being blamed for the death of as many as 600 Iranian citizens (with thousands more hospitalised) following their consumption of pure alcohol in an attempt to destroy the virus [3]. Whilst high-proof alcohol can be used to sanitise hands and surfaces, it should not be consumed to combat the virus.

Claim: Once you catch the coronavirus, you have it for life

Reality: This is not true - most people that contract the virus will recover [4]

Such concerns are dangerous on a number of levels. Firstly, whilst people must be careful regarding the spread of the virus, such information is likely to heighten stress in a way that is counterproductive. Secondly, the idea that someone contracts the virus for life can create a culture of stigmatisation and lead to the rejection of those that have come into contact with it. Whilst we must be very careful and limit contact as much as possible - especially for those showing virus symptoms - this is not a time to create negative societal dividing lines between those that have had the virus and those that haven't.

Claim: The ability to hold your breath for over 10 seconds means that you do not have the coronavirus

Reality: This is not the case.

Whilst people with coronavirus may experience respiratory problems, holding one's breath for an arbitrary amount of time is not a valid test for having it. This 'self-test' was falsely purported to come from Stanford University but has been completely dismissed [4]. Belief in a completely baseless test can lull people that may have minor symptoms into a false sense of security, making it more likely for them to spread the virus further.

The World Health Organization has created a 'Coronavirus Mythbusters' page, on which is has included these and a number of other pieces of unhelpful, false information to look out for [5].

If you are hearing of new pieces of false or unhelpful information that you think people should know about, do let us know on twitter @commonspace.eu #knowthefacts

Source: William Murray, LINKS Europe Project Officer and Coordinator, for commonspace.eu.

 

Featured references:

[1] RFERL - 'No Joke! Serbian President Makes Light Of Coronavirus As One More Reason To Hit The Bottle': https://www.rferl.org/a/serbian-president-makes-light-of-coronavirus-as-one-more-reason-to-hit-the-bottle/30468925.html

[2] USA Today - 'Fact check: To minimize coronavirus risk, use alcohol for sanitizing, not for drinking': https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/03/20/fact-check-drinking-alcohol-wont-reduce-coronavirus-risk/2881704001/

[3] The New York Post - 'Hundreds dead in Iran after drinking pure alcohol as coronavirus 'cure': https://nypost.com/2020/04/08/hundreds-dead-in-iran-after-drinking-pure-alcohol-as-coronavirus-cure/

[4] Stanford University Twitter: https://twitter.com/Stanford/status/1238327187155156992

[5] World Health Organization - 'Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: Myth busters': https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters

Photo credit: Lewis Ogden

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)