Armenian authorities move against opposition leader Gagik Tsarukyan

The Armenian authorities have moved against the leader of the largest opposition party in parliament, Gagik Tsarukyan, searching his house on Sunday morning, and questioning him for eight hours at the offices of the National Security Service. The leader of the Prosperous Armenia Party(PAP) is one of the country's most colourful politicians, and also one of its richest citizens - an oligarch with varied business interests who has so far been considered as untouchable. PAP has 26 members in the country's 132 seat legislature.

On Sunday, Tsarukyan's supporters gathered, first near his house and later at the offices of the National Security Service to protest against his detention. Dozens of people were arrested during some tense confrontations with police. Opposition leaders accused the police of excessive use of force, although there were no reports of anyone being hospitalised.

The National Security Service issued a number of statements explaining what cases where being investigated. They include financial irregularities at Casino Shangri La owned by Gagik Tsarukyan. According to the NSS statement, it operated without a license, which resulted in the loss of billions of Armenian Drams in damage to the state budget.

The case is related to vote buying during the 2017 parliamentary election.

A third case involves illegal transfer of land in Kotayk district.

Tsarukyan has said that the authorities have moved against him after he called for resignations from government for their failure to deal properly with the coronavirus pandemic. The government has insisted that no one is above the law.

As a member of parliament Gagik Tsarukyan has parliamentary immunity. PAP politicians on Monday said they expected the government to address the parliament to lift this immunity.

In a carefully worded statement, Armenia's second largest parliamentary opposition party - Bright Armenia on Monday called on the authorities to desist from selective justice and blackmail. The statement said:

"The Bright Armenia party reaffirms that those who have committed crimes should be prosecuted and sentenced in accordance with the RA legislation.

At the same time, by adhering to the values ​​of the rule of law and the rule of law, we condemn the political influence and control over any criminal prosecution. Anyone who violates the law should be held accountable with the full force of the law, but the use of legal proceedings, as well as the use of blackmail and compromising information as a political tool to silence, suppress and suppress opponents, is unacceptable and reprehensible. Political influence over law enforcement destroys the legitimacy of criminal prosecution.

Along with the above-mentioned processes, the representatives of the political authorities, including the deputies and the ministers, were spreading evidence on social networks that apparently contained confidential information from the preliminary investigation.

Moreover, the above-mentioned officials made statements with a clear violation of the presumption of innocence.

It is noteworthy that criminal cases are initiated on different cases during the same day and the same person is summoned for questioning in the same cases.

The above clearly shows that criminal prosecution takes place under political intervention and control. This already proves the obvious lack of honesty of the ruling political force in the implementation of state policy and being guided by double standards, which is manifested in compromising policy and selective application of the law. The Bright Armenia Party strongly condemns the criminal prosecution and the selective application of the law on the basis of political expediency.

We call on the authorities to fight the epidemic and manage the difficult socio-economic situation, leaving the criminal prosecution only to the law enforcement agencies."

source; commonspace.eu with agencies.

photo: Gagik Tsarukyan (archive picture)

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)