Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
News

African Union initiates changes in its peacekeeping operation in Somalia

4 March 2022

The African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) has announced that its mandate will end as of the 31st of March. After being active in Somalia for a total of 14 years, the force will hand its responsibilities to the African Union Transitional Mission in Somalia (ATMIS).

In a press conference on Monday, AU Commissioner for Peace & Security Bankole Adeoye, introduced the new transitional force, underlining its temporary nature: “ATMIS will have a character of a mission with an end goal, and that end goal is to transfer the full responsibilities of security to the federal Government of Somalia”

Furthermore, Commissioner Adeoye has announced the transitional mission to be entirely in-line with the Somalia Transition Plan (STP). The STP outlines a gradual transfer of responsibility from international stakeholders to the Government of Somalia by 2023.

Critics suggest that the African Union, under continuous pressure to remove its AMISOM force, has simply rebranded its existing mission. The responsibilities of the ATMIS overlap, almost entirely, with that of AMISOM. According to Commissioner Adeoye however, the new mission aims to put Somalian interests at the helm of its operations.

Next Monday, the 7th of March, marks the 15th anniversary of AMISOM. Internationally, the mission is widely seen as a success in stabilizing the country at a time when it was in the grip of a civil war in 2006. Al-Shabaab, the Al-Qaeda linked Islamic terrorist group, has been ousted from Somalia’s key cities and towns. With the help of AMISOM, government forces were able to recapture Mogadishu’s airport, seaport, and government buildings in late 2011.

Along with a de facto extension of an African Union peacekeeping mission in the country, comes some reform in the military and political workings of AMISOM. The reformed ATMIS will be reviewed every 6 months, requiring further approval from the United Nations, the European Union, and the Somali Government to continue operations.

Additionally, Commissioner Adeoye, vowed to place all ATMIS forces under the control of an Ugandan Force Commander. According to IPI Global Observatory’s Colin Robinson, troop contributing countries (TCCs) were virtually “fighting their own separate wars for their own reasons under the AMISOM banner”.

Uganda is the largest TCC. The remaining TCCs include Kenya, Ethiopia, Burundi, and Djibouti. The introduction of ATMIS has piqued the interest of other potential contributing countries, including Egypt, Tunisia, and Rwanda who have all contributed in past AU peacekeeping missions.

The alleged rebranding of AMISOM to ATMIS mirrors the UNs renaming of its peacekeeping operations in Congo. A lack of progress, despite continued presence in the country, led to a desire for change, even though the political causes for trouble had not changed. 

Despite this criticism, a renewed political willingness from the Somali side to cooperate with regional and international actors may mark a new era in Somalia’s politics. The Head of AMISOM, Ambassador Francisco Madeira, has called for participating states to “remain focused…and united in their common purpose”.

Somalia is due to finish its lower house of representative elections on the 15th of March, after which its parliament elects a President. The elections have been tainted by continuous Al-Shabaab operations, including those targeting parliamentary candidates. Commissioner Adeoye indicated that a new mission will be equipped to tackle this recent surge in Al-Shabaab activity: “ATMIS will have a mobile and agile force that can rapidly degrade, eliminate and decimate terrorists”.

The introduction of the ATMIS is subject to the approval of its mandate by both the AU Peace & Security Council as well as the UN Security Council, which is due to debate the issue later this month.

Sources: IPI Global Observatory, AMISOM, BBC Somali
Photo: African Union Commissioner for Political Affairs, Peace & Security, Ambassador Bankole Adeoye (center-left) with AMISOM Head of Mission, Ambassador Francisco Madeira (center-right), at a press conference in Mogadishu on the 1st of March.

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut