Nalbandian blames EU for Armenia not signing Association Agreement in 2013.

The Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian gave his version of events as to why Armenia did not sign an Association Agreement with the European Union in 2013, as had been planned.

Speaking at the opening of the 89th NATO Parliamentary Assembly Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan on 18 June, Nalbandian said that Armenia had wanted to join the Russia led Customs Union long before September 2013. "For a long time prior to that when we were asked whether we wanted to join the Customs Union we said yes. We did not join because nobody had invited us to until that point", Nalbandian said to the astonishment of some of those present.

Nalbandian said that Armenia wanted to co-operate with everybody, but was presented with a choice of either signing the EU Association Agreement or joining the Russian led Eurasian Economic Union. "We were told we had to make a choice, even a civilizational choice. Armenia made its civilization choice centuries ago and did not need to make another one. We wanted to sign the Association Agreement, but without the DCFTA provisions but we were told this was not possible and that the Association Agreement was incompatible with EEU membership", the Minister said. Nalbandian blamed Brussels for forcing the decision on Armenia. He said that now Armenia and the EU were looking at ways in which they could take their co-operation forward, and have agreed to co-operate on a range of issues as long "as these were compatible with Armenian international obligations".

Nalbandian welcomed the fact that the Riga Summit had recommended that the EU member states give the European Commission a new mandate to negotiate the new arrangements.

Commonspace.eu political editor said that many in the European Union will find Minister's Nalbandian version of events around the issue of the signing of the Association Agreement between Armenia and the EU in 2013, astonishing. The negotiations on the Association Agreement were discussed in dozens of meetings over several years, and September 2013 a thousand page document had been agreed and was ready for signature. Throughout the process Armenian officials assured Brussels that the Association Agreement with the EU was their choice - something that makes sense giving that the EU is Armenia's largest trading partner.

This version of events also contradicts informal briefings that Armenian diplomats had given immediately after Armenia abandoned the signing of the Association Agreement, namely that Armenia was under considerable pressure to do so from Russia. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan himself highlighted issues of security when he announced the decision in Moscow on 3 September 2013.

It is not clear what has caused Armenian diplomacy to change its narrative, but this is unlikey to contribute to easy negotiations once the process of a new contractual relationship starts being negotiated.

Source: commonspace.eu

photo: The Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian. (picture from archive)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Nikol Pashinyan re-appointed as Armenian prime minister after decisive June election victory

Nikol Pashinyan re-appointed as Armenian prime minister after decisive June election victory

Armenia president, Vahagn Khachaturyan has re-appointed Nikol Pashinyan as Armenian prime minister, after the decisive victory of his Civil Contract party in parliamentary elections in June. During a ceremony at the Presidential Palace in Yerevan, President Khachaturyan signed a decree on the appointment of Nikol Pashinyan as Prime Minister of the Republic. President Vahagn Khachaturyan said in short remarks: It is a great honor for me to sign a decree on appointing you to the post of Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, for which I received a proposal from the political majority in the National Assembly, under Article 149 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. I sincerely congratulate you, I wish you great patience, endurance, and determination to lead us in these difficult times, to lead the country to the future, a prosperous future. Nikol Pashinyan thanked the president and added,  I must say honestly that in 2018, when I assumed the post of Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia as a result of the People's, non-violent, velvet revolution, it would have been difficult to predict that we would go down such a path and I think it would have been difficult to predict that we would be able to overcome this path. But we are where we are, and I think that the key role and significance in all this is unequivocally and undoubtedly the people of the Republic of Armenia, who, after all, have demonstrated special expressions of state consciousness and state-centeredness throughout this period. And of course, this is a great obligation and commitment. Of course, the Government will be formed in the near future and all members of the Government, including me, will already enshrine our obligations to our people in the text of the oath.  In the meantime Ruben Rubinyan has been elected Speaker of the National Assembly of Armenia, following a secret vote of MPs. He is a 36-year-old MP from the ruling Civil Contract party, who was one of the deputy speakers in the previous parliament and, until recently, was the special representative in the negotiations on the normalization of relations with Turkey.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)