The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has entered a new phase

This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

Since the beginning of the year the number of incidents between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces on the line of contact separating them in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, and on the international border between them, have increased substantially - not only in number, but also in their  gravity. The tension on the front line continues to be accompanied by sharp exchanges of verbal tirades from Baku and Yerevan (with Stepanakert chipping in on the side of the latter from time to time). On the other hand both sides have excelled themselves in spreading disinformation -distorting real information on the causes of the incidents, the number of casualties that they suffered, or that they have inflicted on their opponents. Despite the fog of lies we can conclude that casualties in January 2015 were high, on average of one a day.

On Friday ( 23 January) the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk said developments on the contact line are a cause for concern  citing reports of use of heavier weapons in ceasefire violations, and an increasing number of incursions across the border and the line of contact resulting in increased casualties.

In the past there have been occasions when violence on the front line momentarily increased for a day or two, to settle down soon after to a routine of exchange of bullets during the night, often blamed on bored soldiers in trenches venting their frustration. Clearly what we have seen since the beginning of the year is something different: more serious, more sustained, and more dangerous.

Both sides blame each other. On Monday (26 January), President Serzh Sargsyan gave the Armenian perspective when he spoke to the Board of the Armenian Ministry of Defence in Yerevan. The President said that the start of the year has been tense and admitted that Armenia had suffered casualties. He accused Azerbaijan of wanting to create constant tension around the Armenian side. Sargsyan added: "This is a simply a policy of blackmail aimed not so much at us, but at the international community. Official Baku is attempting to show everyone what it can do if all of its whims are not met."

On the other hand Azerbaijan blames Armenia of intransigence in the peace negotiations. President Ilham Aliev, speaking in Davos on 22 January warned that failure to resolve the conflict could create a precedent: "If the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not resolved based on international law, then you must be ready to see similar things in other parts of the world", he said.

Some may argue that none of this is very different from what we have seen in the past twenty years, and especially in the last five years. There is however one significant difference. The peace process, facilitated by the OSCE Minsk Process is in deep crisis. We have not been told this officially, either by the sides, or by the mediators, but we can easily conclude this from the fact that the two Presidents now seem to have pulled out of the discussions altogether, and their foreign ministers now do not seem to bear being in the same city together, let alone in the same room.

What comes next is a matter of speculation. Most analysts agree that neither side wants  total war if possible, yet there is also some reason to understand that neither Armenia, nor Azerbaijan, are able to sustain the amount of military spending, high level of military alertness, and overall commitment to sustain their positions, for too much longer. Something is going to have to give - and this can be either through negotiations or through war. With the negotiations stalled the options are now very narrow for both sides.

All this is happening whilst the international community is distracted by other very serious crisis right across the world: Ukraine, Yemen, Syria - not to mention the terrorist attacks in Paris, have absorbed the attention of world leaders this long January month.  In comparison Karabakh may seem like a small local difficulty that will blow over. It is not, and it is impossible to say that the situation we have today is the same as that of one five or fifteen years ago.  We have entered a new phase in the Karabakh conflict, and it is a dangerous moment. The standoff between Russia and the rest of the international community on Ukraine means that mobilising a unified response to the escalation is more difficult than ever. The responsibility of the sides to assume themselves responsibility for resolving this terrible conflict is now therefore heavier than ever before. For the sake of their own nations they need to do so.


This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: Armenian Army officers listening to an address by President Serzh Sargsyan in Yerevan on Monday, 26 January 2015. (Picture courtesy of the Press Service of the President of Armenia).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
European leaders set out their plan for Ukraine

European leaders set out their plan for Ukraine

The leaders of Germany, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden, and United Kingdom, together with the President of the European Council, and the President of the European Commission, o  Monday (15 December) issued a statement, outlining their plan for Ukraine. In their statement, Chancellor Merz, Prime Minister Frederiksen, President Stubb, President Macron, Prime Minister Meloni, Prime Minister Schoof, Prime Minister Støre, Prime Minister Tusk, Prime Minister Kristersson, Prime Minister Starmer, as well as President Costa and President von der Leyen spoke about "Peace for Ukraine". The Leaders welcomed significant progress on President Trump’s efforts to secure a just and lasting peace in Ukraine. They also welcomed the close work between President Zelenskyy’s and President Trump’s teams as well as European teams over the recent days and weeks. They agreed to work together with President Trump and President Zelenskyy to get to a lasting peace which preserves Ukrainian sovereignty and European security. Leaders appreciated the strong convergence between the United States, Ukraine and Europe. Leaders agreed that ensuring the security, sovereignty, and prosperity of Ukraine was integral for wider Euro-Atlantic security. They were clear that Ukraine and its people deserved a prosperous, independent, and sovereign future, free from fear of future Russian aggression. Both the US and European leaders committed to work together to provide robust security guarantees and economic recovery support measures for Ukraine in the context of an agreement on ending the war. This would include commitments to: Provide sustained and significant support to Ukraine to build its armed forces, which should remain at a peacetime level of 800,000 to be able to deter conflict and defend Ukraine’s territory. A European-led ‘multinational force Ukraine’ made up from contributions from willing nations within the framework of the Coalition of the Willing and supported by the US. It will assist in the regeneration of Ukraine’s forces, in securing Ukraine’s skies, and in supporting safer seas, including through operating inside Ukraine. (Click the image to read the statement in full).

Popular