The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has entered a new phase

This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

Since the beginning of the year the number of incidents between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces on the line of contact separating them in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, and on the international border between them, have increased substantially - not only in number, but also in their  gravity. The tension on the front line continues to be accompanied by sharp exchanges of verbal tirades from Baku and Yerevan (with Stepanakert chipping in on the side of the latter from time to time). On the other hand both sides have excelled themselves in spreading disinformation -distorting real information on the causes of the incidents, the number of casualties that they suffered, or that they have inflicted on their opponents. Despite the fog of lies we can conclude that casualties in January 2015 were high, on average of one a day.

On Friday ( 23 January) the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk said developments on the contact line are a cause for concern  citing reports of use of heavier weapons in ceasefire violations, and an increasing number of incursions across the border and the line of contact resulting in increased casualties.

In the past there have been occasions when violence on the front line momentarily increased for a day or two, to settle down soon after to a routine of exchange of bullets during the night, often blamed on bored soldiers in trenches venting their frustration. Clearly what we have seen since the beginning of the year is something different: more serious, more sustained, and more dangerous.

Both sides blame each other. On Monday (26 January), President Serzh Sargsyan gave the Armenian perspective when he spoke to the Board of the Armenian Ministry of Defence in Yerevan. The President said that the start of the year has been tense and admitted that Armenia had suffered casualties. He accused Azerbaijan of wanting to create constant tension around the Armenian side. Sargsyan added: "This is a simply a policy of blackmail aimed not so much at us, but at the international community. Official Baku is attempting to show everyone what it can do if all of its whims are not met."

On the other hand Azerbaijan blames Armenia of intransigence in the peace negotiations. President Ilham Aliev, speaking in Davos on 22 January warned that failure to resolve the conflict could create a precedent: "If the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not resolved based on international law, then you must be ready to see similar things in other parts of the world", he said.

Some may argue that none of this is very different from what we have seen in the past twenty years, and especially in the last five years. There is however one significant difference. The peace process, facilitated by the OSCE Minsk Process is in deep crisis. We have not been told this officially, either by the sides, or by the mediators, but we can easily conclude this from the fact that the two Presidents now seem to have pulled out of the discussions altogether, and their foreign ministers now do not seem to bear being in the same city together, let alone in the same room.

What comes next is a matter of speculation. Most analysts agree that neither side wants  total war if possible, yet there is also some reason to understand that neither Armenia, nor Azerbaijan, are able to sustain the amount of military spending, high level of military alertness, and overall commitment to sustain their positions, for too much longer. Something is going to have to give - and this can be either through negotiations or through war. With the negotiations stalled the options are now very narrow for both sides.

All this is happening whilst the international community is distracted by other very serious crisis right across the world: Ukraine, Yemen, Syria - not to mention the terrorist attacks in Paris, have absorbed the attention of world leaders this long January month.  In comparison Karabakh may seem like a small local difficulty that will blow over. It is not, and it is impossible to say that the situation we have today is the same as that of one five or fifteen years ago.  We have entered a new phase in the Karabakh conflict, and it is a dangerous moment. The standoff between Russia and the rest of the international community on Ukraine means that mobilising a unified response to the escalation is more difficult than ever. The responsibility of the sides to assume themselves responsibility for resolving this terrible conflict is now therefore heavier than ever before. For the sake of their own nations they need to do so.


This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: Armenian Army officers listening to an address by President Serzh Sargsyan in Yerevan on Monday, 26 January 2015. (Picture courtesy of the Press Service of the President of Armenia).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)