The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has entered a new phase

This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

Since the beginning of the year the number of incidents between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces on the line of contact separating them in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone, and on the international border between them, have increased substantially - not only in number, but also in their  gravity. The tension on the front line continues to be accompanied by sharp exchanges of verbal tirades from Baku and Yerevan (with Stepanakert chipping in on the side of the latter from time to time). On the other hand both sides have excelled themselves in spreading disinformation -distorting real information on the causes of the incidents, the number of casualties that they suffered, or that they have inflicted on their opponents. Despite the fog of lies we can conclude that casualties in January 2015 were high, on average of one a day.

On Friday ( 23 January) the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk said developments on the contact line are a cause for concern  citing reports of use of heavier weapons in ceasefire violations, and an increasing number of incursions across the border and the line of contact resulting in increased casualties.

In the past there have been occasions when violence on the front line momentarily increased for a day or two, to settle down soon after to a routine of exchange of bullets during the night, often blamed on bored soldiers in trenches venting their frustration. Clearly what we have seen since the beginning of the year is something different: more serious, more sustained, and more dangerous.

Both sides blame each other. On Monday (26 January), President Serzh Sargsyan gave the Armenian perspective when he spoke to the Board of the Armenian Ministry of Defence in Yerevan. The President said that the start of the year has been tense and admitted that Armenia had suffered casualties. He accused Azerbaijan of wanting to create constant tension around the Armenian side. Sargsyan added: "This is a simply a policy of blackmail aimed not so much at us, but at the international community. Official Baku is attempting to show everyone what it can do if all of its whims are not met."

On the other hand Azerbaijan blames Armenia of intransigence in the peace negotiations. President Ilham Aliev, speaking in Davos on 22 January warned that failure to resolve the conflict could create a precedent: "If the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not resolved based on international law, then you must be ready to see similar things in other parts of the world", he said.

Some may argue that none of this is very different from what we have seen in the past twenty years, and especially in the last five years. There is however one significant difference. The peace process, facilitated by the OSCE Minsk Process is in deep crisis. We have not been told this officially, either by the sides, or by the mediators, but we can easily conclude this from the fact that the two Presidents now seem to have pulled out of the discussions altogether, and their foreign ministers now do not seem to bear being in the same city together, let alone in the same room.

What comes next is a matter of speculation. Most analysts agree that neither side wants  total war if possible, yet there is also some reason to understand that neither Armenia, nor Azerbaijan, are able to sustain the amount of military spending, high level of military alertness, and overall commitment to sustain their positions, for too much longer. Something is going to have to give - and this can be either through negotiations or through war. With the negotiations stalled the options are now very narrow for both sides.

All this is happening whilst the international community is distracted by other very serious crisis right across the world: Ukraine, Yemen, Syria - not to mention the terrorist attacks in Paris, have absorbed the attention of world leaders this long January month.  In comparison Karabakh may seem like a small local difficulty that will blow over. It is not, and it is impossible to say that the situation we have today is the same as that of one five or fifteen years ago.  We have entered a new phase in the Karabakh conflict, and it is a dangerous moment. The standoff between Russia and the rest of the international community on Ukraine means that mobilising a unified response to the escalation is more difficult than ever. The responsibility of the sides to assume themselves responsibility for resolving this terrible conflict is now therefore heavier than ever before. For the sake of their own nations they need to do so.


This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: Armenian Army officers listening to an address by President Serzh Sargsyan in Yerevan on Monday, 26 January 2015. (Picture courtesy of the Press Service of the President of Armenia).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.