Larisa Alaverdyan:

Having allowed Azerbaijan to become active in Khojalu problem, Armenia has taken no action in the Sumgait one, deputy of the parliament from the Heritage faction, Larisa Alaverdyan, told ArmInfo correspondent.

"Armenia was idle in the matter of recognition and condemnation of the Sumgait tragedy by the world community. And only 2-2,5 years ago the steps were taken towards recognition of the Sumgait events like a genocide which was continuation of the anti-Armenian policy of Turkey. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan held a rather convincing campaign thanks to which it has managed to assure several countries that in Khojalu Armenians made a genocide and this is a historical truth", - she said and added that the state has been conducting a wrong policy regarding the relatives of the victims of the Sumgait genocide.

Alaverdyan said that finally Armenia has managed to create the machinery to resist false policy of Azerbaijan but the Sumgait problem still remains open. "It is already for three years I have been fighting for recognition of this genocide by our parliament...I hope that the Sumgait genocide will be finally recognized not only by us but also by many other countries, as actually it is a true tragic event", - she said.

24 years ago, on 27-29 Feb 1988, the events that happened in the industrial town of Sumgait (at 25 km from Baku), part of the Soviet Union at that time, led to the death of hundreds of peaceful and  innocent Armenians. Today, many people in the world qualify those horrible events as genocide, and many people, for instance, in Baku think that Armenians were killing themselves. However, like in many other cases, the truth is one and it is not subject to interpretation. In the case of Sumgait, it is reflected by the murders of hundreds of people, and the murders became possible due to some people's big hunger for power amid the unjustified weakness and indifference of the people who had the power at that time.

The Sumgait massacre of Armenians was committed in response to the Karabakh people's legitimate expression of will for reunification with the Armenian SSR. The mass pogroms of Armenians in Sumgait were accompanied by mass violence against the Armenian population, robberies, murders, rapes, arsons and destruction of property. Actually, the Sumgait massacre led to aggravation of the first conflict between the nations of the Transcaucasus and caused the first flows of Armenian refugees from Sumgait to Stepanakert and Armenia. According to official data, 26 Armenians were killed and more than 100 were wounded, though experts estimated that the death toll was about 200. All this medieval vandalism took place amid full paralyzation of the local authorities in Sumgait and Baku and the central authorities in Moscow.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)