Georgia's new political reality

This is a commentary by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The final results in last Saturday's parliamentary elections in Georgia have been announced by the Central Elections Commission, after all votes have been counted.  Georgian Dream has won 48.65%, United National Movement 27.13%, and Patriots Alliance has 5%. No other party has passed the threshold.

The result brings to Georgia a new political reality.

For the first time Georgian Dream will govern on its own, and not in coalition. This will give it more room for political manoeuvre, but it takes away the restraining aspects that coalitions inevitably bring about. The absence of the Republican Party, and particularly its leader Davit Usupashvili, the outgoing Chairman of Parliament, will be felt both in policy, as well as in the prestige of the parliament, to which he contributed much in the last four years

Only three parties have won enough votes to secure seats in parliament through the proportional list. As things stand now, Georgian Dream will get 44 out of the 77 seats under this system, United National Movement 27 and Patriots Alliance, 6.  They will be joined by the 73 MPs elected in the single mandate constituency elections. Many of these are yet to be chosen, since they need to go to a run off after failing to secure 50% of the votes cast in the first round. Georgian Dream is expected to win most of them.

One party that will no longer be in the Parliament is the pro-western Free Democrats, whose leader, Irakli Alasania said on Monday he was taking time off from politics after the party just missed the 5% threshold, securing only 4.6% of the vote.

The new party in parliament is the Patriotic Alliance, an unknown political quantity, but one whose rhetoric during the campaign has caused some concerns due to its xenophobic character. Their role will be larger than their numeric size suggests, since they will play a role between GD government and the main opposition force the UNM. Their presence in parliament is an opportunity for them to show their political responsibility.

The UNM remain undecided how to play their next political move. Their leader in exile, Mikheil Saakashvili has asked for a boycott of parliament. In the rest of the party this idea is not liked by everybody. Key party leaders have emphasised that they will pursue tough opposition to the government, but within the constitutional order. That needs to be an unambiguous commitment. There is no space in Georgia for parties in the twilight zone of democracy.

This has been a good election, despite the isolated incidents of violence that stopped it short of being called exemplary. This was well articulated in the statements of the Parliamentary Assemblies (OSCE, NATO, Council of Europe and European parliament), as well as credible local NGOs. Any attempt to throw open its legitimacy is unlikely to have much credence. Georgia needs a stable government and a strong and articulate opposition that is able to hold it to account. The country has big and important challenges ahead. Politicians need to regroup and re-adjust to new realities, but they must remember that their first duty is to their country and its people and not to their egos.

This is a commentary prepared by the political editor of ocmmonspace.eu.

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)