First president of Armenia:

Any resolution of the Karabakh conflict today will be worse than it could be before, unfortunately, Levon Ter- Petrosyan, the first president of Armenia, leader of the oppositional Armenian National Congress, said in an interview with Moskovskiye Novosti.

"It will be very difficult now to achieve what we could achieve before. There is a single detail that differs from that project - the  idea of the referendum of the status of Nagorny Karabakh. But, that idea has not been confirmed officially yet. Even this word is avoided  now. They speak of plebiscite, poll etc. There is no talk on the  legal consequences of that referendum. All this shows that everything  is much more difficult now," he said.

"There is a relevant document saying that exchange of territories was  implied between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Karabakh was supposedly to  join Armenia and Nakhjevan - Azerbaijan via Meghri corridor. No one  invented that. But I would not agree on such a decision then. In that  case, we would lose the border with Iran, which is of more strategic  importance for Armenia than Karabakh. Unfortunately, much has been  lost over those13 years. This is the lost time, development  opportunities and people who left Armenia forever. They try to do  what we could do 13 years ago now but at a very high cost," he said.   In 1998, Ter-Petrosyan said, the parties were very close to the  resolution. At first, there was the co-called package  settlement-scheme. Karabakh opposed that and Azerbaijan agreed  partially, while Armenia agreed on it.  Then a stage-by-stage  settle-scheme was introduced. It was almost the same plan as the one  on the table now in terms of the Madrid Principles:  return of the  part of the liberated territories that earlier did not include Lachin  and Kelbajar, deployment of international peacekeepers along the new
border of Karabakh, reopening of roads, establishment of an interim status of Karabakh, maintenance of all the state structures of  Nagorny Karabakh including Army, Police etc, non-interference of  Azerbaijan into the internal affairs of Karabakh, and discussion of the final status of Karabakh in future.

"All this existed and gave the same situation as we have now but in a reduced territory but with a guaranteed international treaty, with  guaranteed international peacekeeping forces, with guaranteed  deblockade of roads, including railways. Naturally, the Turkish  border would open at once. Armenia would get an opportunity to  develop. What we have now is the fivefold higher GDP and budget of  Azerbaijan and tenfold higher military budget as compared to Armenia.  In fact, Azerbaijan has much more tenacious position and tougher  demands," Levon Ter-Peterosyan said.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)