First president of Armenia:

Any resolution of the Karabakh conflict today will be worse than it could be before, unfortunately, Levon Ter- Petrosyan, the first president of Armenia, leader of the oppositional Armenian National Congress, said in an interview with Moskovskiye Novosti.

"It will be very difficult now to achieve what we could achieve before. There is a single detail that differs from that project - the  idea of the referendum of the status of Nagorny Karabakh. But, that idea has not been confirmed officially yet. Even this word is avoided  now. They speak of plebiscite, poll etc. There is no talk on the  legal consequences of that referendum. All this shows that everything  is much more difficult now," he said.

"There is a relevant document saying that exchange of territories was  implied between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Karabakh was supposedly to  join Armenia and Nakhjevan - Azerbaijan via Meghri corridor. No one  invented that. But I would not agree on such a decision then. In that  case, we would lose the border with Iran, which is of more strategic  importance for Armenia than Karabakh. Unfortunately, much has been  lost over those13 years. This is the lost time, development  opportunities and people who left Armenia forever. They try to do  what we could do 13 years ago now but at a very high cost," he said.   In 1998, Ter-Petrosyan said, the parties were very close to the  resolution. At first, there was the co-called package  settlement-scheme. Karabakh opposed that and Azerbaijan agreed  partially, while Armenia agreed on it.  Then a stage-by-stage  settle-scheme was introduced. It was almost the same plan as the one  on the table now in terms of the Madrid Principles:  return of the  part of the liberated territories that earlier did not include Lachin  and Kelbajar, deployment of international peacekeepers along the new
border of Karabakh, reopening of roads, establishment of an interim status of Karabakh, maintenance of all the state structures of  Nagorny Karabakh including Army, Police etc, non-interference of  Azerbaijan into the internal affairs of Karabakh, and discussion of the final status of Karabakh in future.

"All this existed and gave the same situation as we have now but in a reduced territory but with a guaranteed international treaty, with  guaranteed international peacekeeping forces, with guaranteed  deblockade of roads, including railways. Naturally, the Turkish  border would open at once. Armenia would get an opportunity to  develop. What we have now is the fivefold higher GDP and budget of  Azerbaijan and tenfold higher military budget as compared to Armenia.  In fact, Azerbaijan has much more tenacious position and tougher  demands," Levon Ter-Peterosyan said.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament, during its plenary session in Strasbourg, approved the European Commission's proposal to apply a system of trade measures for "Made in Armenia" products, which means there will be a temporary elimination of customs duties on a wide range of products imported from Armenia to the European Union.   The proposal presented by the European Commission was adopted at the plenary session of the Council of Europe with 583 votes in favor, 49 against and 39 abstentions. According to the proposal, the European Union plans to eliminate customs duties on a number of Armenian goods for a period of two years. At the same time, it is planned to establish duty-free import quotas for eight types of Armenian agricultural products. These include grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches, and cucumbers. The draft also provides for safeguard mechanisms that will allow the European Union to intervene, if necessary, if increased imports from Armenia have a negative impact on European producers. This step is due to the restrictions imposed by Russia on a number of important Armenian export products since May 2026. They relate, in particular, to alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, fruits and vegetables, as well as their transit through Russian territory. According to the European Commission, these restrictions have disrupted Armenia's traditional supply chains and significantly limited the country's access to traditional export markets. The situation has had a particularly severe impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as agricultural producers, while creating challenges for Armenia's economic resilience. The EU sees the initiative as a temporary measure to support the Armenian economy and create additional opportunities for exporters to access the EU market. The next step for the proposal is formal approval by the EU Council. The regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Let us recall that on September 2, the Council of the European Union approved the proposal to establish temporary trade liberalization measures for Armenian products and sent the draft to the European Parliament for approval. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)