Editorial: Vienna was a small, but important step forward

Editorial by commonspace.eu

The meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, held in Vienna on Monday (16 May) was a positive step forward in the turbulent relations between the two countries, who for decades have now been caught in a conflict between them over Nagorno-Karabakh. The meeting was held in the presence of the US Secretary of State and the Foreign Minister of Russia, as well as representatives of France and the OSCE.

As these things often are it was a well choreographed affair, but the absence of warm hand shakes or cosy tete a tete's between the two Presidents reflected how the atmosphere between them has been poisoned by the recent fighting that saw the fragile cease fire violated in serious incidents which claimed dozens of life.

The Vienna meeting opened the way for diplomacy to resume, and for efforts to be intensified for a resolution of this senseless conflict.

The wording of the statement issued by France, Russia and the United States, as co-Chair of the Minsk process is vague. But there are some tangible points which may offer a basis for future work:

- they agreed to finalize in the shortest possible time an OSCE investigative mechanism to help avoid further incidents

- they agreed to the expansion of the existing Office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson in Office

- they agreed to continue the exchange of data on missing persons under the auspices of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to which the Presidents had committed during the Paris summit of October 2014.

- they agreed on a next round of talks, to be held in June at a place to be mutually agreed, with an aim to resuming negotiations on a comprehensive settlement.

These four points hardly constitute a dramatic breakthrough, but if an investigative mechanism on incidents on the front line can be agreed this would be an important way of reducing the danger of violence. The expansion of the office of the Personal Representative will also enable this to happen. The handful of staff that currently monitor the cease fire are clearly not enough.

But perhaps the most important decision in Vienna was to agree on the resumption of talks "with an aim to resuming negotiations on a comprehensive settlement". For make no mistake about it, Vienna was not about solving the Karabakh conflict, simply a concerted effort by the international community to stop Armenia and Azerbaijan from sliding into a new war. While this is important the work to resolve the conflict must continue in earnest if future violence is to be avoided.

 

This editorial was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)