Editorial: Vienna was a small, but important step forward

Editorial by commonspace.eu

The meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, held in Vienna on Monday (16 May) was a positive step forward in the turbulent relations between the two countries, who for decades have now been caught in a conflict between them over Nagorno-Karabakh. The meeting was held in the presence of the US Secretary of State and the Foreign Minister of Russia, as well as representatives of France and the OSCE.

As these things often are it was a well choreographed affair, but the absence of warm hand shakes or cosy tete a tete's between the two Presidents reflected how the atmosphere between them has been poisoned by the recent fighting that saw the fragile cease fire violated in serious incidents which claimed dozens of life.

The Vienna meeting opened the way for diplomacy to resume, and for efforts to be intensified for a resolution of this senseless conflict.

The wording of the statement issued by France, Russia and the United States, as co-Chair of the Minsk process is vague. But there are some tangible points which may offer a basis for future work:

- they agreed to finalize in the shortest possible time an OSCE investigative mechanism to help avoid further incidents

- they agreed to the expansion of the existing Office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairperson in Office

- they agreed to continue the exchange of data on missing persons under the auspices of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to which the Presidents had committed during the Paris summit of October 2014.

- they agreed on a next round of talks, to be held in June at a place to be mutually agreed, with an aim to resuming negotiations on a comprehensive settlement.

These four points hardly constitute a dramatic breakthrough, but if an investigative mechanism on incidents on the front line can be agreed this would be an important way of reducing the danger of violence. The expansion of the office of the Personal Representative will also enable this to happen. The handful of staff that currently monitor the cease fire are clearly not enough.

But perhaps the most important decision in Vienna was to agree on the resumption of talks "with an aim to resuming negotiations on a comprehensive settlement". For make no mistake about it, Vienna was not about solving the Karabakh conflict, simply a concerted effort by the international community to stop Armenia and Azerbaijan from sliding into a new war. While this is important the work to resolve the conflict must continue in earnest if future violence is to be avoided.

 

This editorial was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)