Editorial: On Belarus, the EU must now act quickly and decisively

The European Union is today faced with one of the most serious challenges to its credibility as a foreign policy actor since it came into being.

The forced diversion by Belarus of a flight between two EU member states on Sunday (23 May) constitutes an act of international piracy at the heart of Europe.

Belarus forced the Ryanair plane, which was flying from Greece to Lithuania, to land in Minsk claiming a bomb threat to the aircraft. The aircraft was due to land in Vilnius when Belarusian authorities scrambled a fighter jet and diverted it to the country's capital, in an operation which the Belarus state media said was personally authorised by President Alexander Lukashenko. In Minsk, the Belarus authorities subsequently arrested the Belarusian journalist and activist Roman Protasevich, who was a passenger on the plane.

There has already been an expression of outrage across Europe and beyond, but outrage is now not enough. 

Relations between Belarus and the European Union have been difficult for many years, and deteriorated even more after the flawed presidential election in Belarus last year. However, it needs to be made clear that this is now no longer about human rights and free elections in Belarus, important as these things are. This is now about the European Union's ability to protect itself and its citizens, and about international air safety in general.

The European Union must now act accordingly, and must do so swiftly and decisively. In the past the argument that isolating Belarus further was counter-productive had some validity. It does not anymore. Under President Lukashenko, Belarus is now a pirate state, and must be treated like one. This will undoubtedly cause some pain to the Belarusian people who are not to blame for the recklessness of their leader, but this is now inevitable. 

This situation also tests Belarus' friends and allies, foremost of which, Russia. It is one thing for President Putin to stick with his ally in the face of criticism about a flawed election, quite another if he does so now when an act of state piracy has been done. Putin is due to meet Lukashenko in Sochi in the next days. We will therefore know soon how Russia will react to this outrage. Other countries too need to be wary. For them too, relations with Belarus cannot be business as usual.

Fortunately this incident has happened at the time when the transatlantic relationship is strong. The US has already expressed strong condemnation of the incident, not least because the lives of US citizens on the plane were put at risk. An EU co-ordinated approach with Washington is necessary, and appears already to be happening. Lukashenko must be made to understand that he has crossed a red line, and that there is a heavy cost to pay as a result.

 

source: This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu
photo: The Ryanair flight flying from Athens to Vilnius was diverted to Belarus on 23 May 2021. The plane is seen here at Minsk airport (picture courtesy of AFP)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular