Editorial: On Belarus, the EU must now act quickly and decisively

The European Union is today faced with one of the most serious challenges to its credibility as a foreign policy actor since it came into being.

The forced diversion by Belarus of a flight between two EU member states on Sunday (23 May) constitutes an act of international piracy at the heart of Europe.

Belarus forced the Ryanair plane, which was flying from Greece to Lithuania, to land in Minsk claiming a bomb threat to the aircraft. The aircraft was due to land in Vilnius when Belarusian authorities scrambled a fighter jet and diverted it to the country's capital, in an operation which the Belarus state media said was personally authorised by President Alexander Lukashenko. In Minsk, the Belarus authorities subsequently arrested the Belarusian journalist and activist Roman Protasevich, who was a passenger on the plane.

There has already been an expression of outrage across Europe and beyond, but outrage is now not enough. 

Relations between Belarus and the European Union have been difficult for many years, and deteriorated even more after the flawed presidential election in Belarus last year. However, it needs to be made clear that this is now no longer about human rights and free elections in Belarus, important as these things are. This is now about the European Union's ability to protect itself and its citizens, and about international air safety in general.

The European Union must now act accordingly, and must do so swiftly and decisively. In the past the argument that isolating Belarus further was counter-productive had some validity. It does not anymore. Under President Lukashenko, Belarus is now a pirate state, and must be treated like one. This will undoubtedly cause some pain to the Belarusian people who are not to blame for the recklessness of their leader, but this is now inevitable. 

This situation also tests Belarus' friends and allies, foremost of which, Russia. It is one thing for President Putin to stick with his ally in the face of criticism about a flawed election, quite another if he does so now when an act of state piracy has been done. Putin is due to meet Lukashenko in Sochi in the next days. We will therefore know soon how Russia will react to this outrage. Other countries too need to be wary. For them too, relations with Belarus cannot be business as usual.

Fortunately this incident has happened at the time when the transatlantic relationship is strong. The US has already expressed strong condemnation of the incident, not least because the lives of US citizens on the plane were put at risk. An EU co-ordinated approach with Washington is necessary, and appears already to be happening. Lukashenko must be made to understand that he has crossed a red line, and that there is a heavy cost to pay as a result.

 

source: This is an editorial comment prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu
photo: The Ryanair flight flying from Athens to Vilnius was diverted to Belarus on 23 May 2021. The plane is seen here at Minsk airport (picture courtesy of AFP)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.