When diplomacy and democracy collide. Obama makes another attempt to appoint an Ambassador in Azerbaijan by nominating Richard Morningstar.

President Barak Obama has nominated Richard L. Morningstar as the new United States Ambassador to Azerbaijan in an effort to try to close a battle between the administration and congress on American representation in Baku. For much of the time of the Obama administration there has not been a United States Ambassador in Azerbaijan, and whatever American officials say in trying to put a brave face on the situation most observors consider this a failure of the American political system.

Richard L. Morningstar has been serving for the last years as US Secretary of State’s Special Envoy for Eurasian Energy, and in that capacity has already had contacts with Azerbaijan and has visited the country on numerous ocassions. His nomination is not likely to be controversial.

Many of the problems connected with the US diplomatic representation in Azerbaijan are the result of efforts of US congressmen reacting to feelings amongst voters of Armenian origin in their constituencies.

The first choice of the Obama administration for Ambassador in Baku was Mathew Bryza, former Assistant Secretary of State during the Bush administration, and also former co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Process. Armenian diaspora groups were unhappy with his nomination from the start and accused Bryza of being "too pro-Azerbaijani", also citing the fact that he had a Turkish wife. The Whitehouse persisted with its choice, and at the end of 2010 it used a provision in the rules of appointment of American envoys to appoint Bryza by Presidential order at a time when Congress was in recess. Under this provision an envoy can serve for one year during which time the Congress will consider his nomination or the envoy will be withdrawn. Since the congress did not confirm Bryza's nomination he was recalled at the end of 2011.

Many considered Bryza an able and charismatic diplomat who had a good rapport with the Azerbaijani leadership and who was well placed to engage with the Azerbaijani government on sensitive issues such as the Karabakh conflict and human rights in a positive way, and that the efforts to block his nomination were counter productive.

This situation has baffled not only the Azerbaijani government, but also most of the international community which expected to have a stable American diplomatic presence in Baku during the time when the country is becoming increasingly important in regional and international issues, and also at a challenging time for the country's internal political development.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: This is a classic case where diplomacy and democracy have collided. The American system of checks and balances gives the US Congress rights on the appointment of US Ambassadors. Electoral considerations have caused US Congressman to intervene in an area of foreign policy in a somewhat controversial way, but the administration had no choice but to bow its head to their views. It is now hoped that Congress will move fast with the appointment of Morningstar so that there will be a stable American diplomatic presence in Baku as soon as possible.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: A general view of the building of the US Congress in Washington DC (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)