Well done Switzerland! The Swiss Chairmanship of the OSCE in 2014 was marked by challenges to European security.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

The Ministerial Council of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) was held in Basel on 4 and 5 December, as the one year Swiss Chairmanship of the organisation comes to an end.

The fifty seven member states of the organisation, representing the countries of Europe, North America and Eurasia were unanimous in their praise of how Switzerland has handled the work of the OSCE in the last year, probably the most difficult year for the organisation since it came into existence. The year was overshadowed by the crisis in Ukraine and the break-down of the European security order with the Russian occupation and annexation of Crimea. The Swiss Chairman-in-Office, Foreign Minister Burkhalter described the year as "special", and that perhaps was an understatement. Secretary General Lamberto Zannier more realistically described it in the final press conference in Basel, as one of the most challenging years in the history of the organisation. Indeed the last months could very well have broken the OSCE, but the Swiss Chairmanship managed the challenges in a way that the OSCE succeeded in gaining strength from the crisis.

The results from the Ministerial meeting in Basel were nothing but modest, and in the circumstances this was to be expected. There was no comprehensive final declaration, and nothing very much was said on anything in the few final papers that were adopted. But as Foreign Minister Burkhalter said,  it was necessary in the meeting to keep all the sides engaged in dialogue, and to identify areas were co-operation could be continued, even as the divisions on many issues, and particularly Ukraine, remain huge. This objective was achieved. However of course this is only short term success. The major problems remain.

Next year the OSCE marks the 40th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act. A Helsinki+40 strategy is under discussion, but the differences in the vision between different sides, particularly between Russia and the West, remain huge.  It is clear that the OSCE knows where it is coming from, but it remains far from clear where it, and through it the whole future of European security, is going. The organisation therefore has its work for the next two or three years well cut out for it.

Serbia takes over the OSCE Chairmanship in 2015, followed by Germany and Austria in 2016 and 2017 respectively. Thanks to the Swiss Chairmanship the future of the OSCE has been secured at least in the short term. The incoming chairmanships now need to take the process forward.

For the moment however, diplomats can allow themselves a moment of self-satisfaction, and a genuine expression of "well done Switzerland"!

source: This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: Swiss Foreign Minister Burkhalter addressing the opening session of the OSCE Ministerial Council in Basel on 4 December 2014. (picture courtesy of the OSCE).


 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)