Is there a growing sense of urgency in Georgia to de-occupy Abkhazia and South Ossetia?

In a recent interview with Bloomberg on 1 February, Georgian President Salome Zourabichvili for the first time stated that the diplomatic settlement to end the Russian Federation's full-scale war against Ukraine should include the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Georgian territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which have been under Russian control for 30 years.

She called for the Georgian issue to be put on the negotiating table, asserting that a resolution to the Russia-Ukraine war cannot be achieved without Russia's retreat from all the occupied territories.

President Zourabichvili highlighted the need for Russia to "learn where its borders are" and underscored the importance of the Western world making sound decisions. She emphasised that following the anticipated defeat of Russia in Ukraine, the Russian Federation will be obliged to return not only the occupied territories to Ukraine, but also returning occupied territories to Georgia. The President cautioned that if the West fails to demand a full withdrawal of Russian troops as part of surrender terms, it would be making a grave error akin to the mistakes made in 2008 and 2014.

Zourabichvili's call is a significant departure from previous positions

The President's call for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgian territories comes at a time when tensions between Georgia and Russia remain high. In 2008, Russian troops invaded Georgia and occupied one-fifth of its territory, leading to the Russian Federation's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states, which have not been recognized by the international community. The Russian military claimed that the operation was aimed at "forcing peace".

It is worth noting that President Zourabichvili's recent call for the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgian territories represents a significant departure from the Georgian government's previous position on this issue. The ruling Georgian Dream party has traditionally been more cautious on this matter, and the president's statements may reflect a growing sense of urgency among Georgians to end Russia's long standing occupation, particularly in light of Russia's faltering offensive in Ukraine.

This marks the first time in recent memory that a high-ranking Georgian official has expressed such a strong stance on the issue of de-occupation, suggesting a possible shift in the country's approach to the issue.

source: Giorgi Arziani is founder of Tbilisi School for Social Research, also known as the Library about Georgia, a non-profit public policy organisation based in Tbilisi, Georgia. Its mission is to conduct in-depth research that leads to evidence-based solutions for the de-occupation, modernisation and democratic development of Georgia.
photo: agenda.ge
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)