Russia isolated at OSCE PA in Baku. Parliamentarians condemn Russia's annexation of Crimea and call for its reversal.

In their "Baku Declaration" Parliamentarians condemn Russia's annexation of Crimea and call for its reversal. The declaration also expresses deep concern at the fate of victims of politicised court cases in Azerbaijan.

The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly meeting in Baku has adopted a resolution calling on Russia to reverse its annexation of Crimea and the port of Sebastopol. The resolution was part of the "Baku declaration" issued by the Assembly at the end of its session. The resolution was adopted with 97 voting in favour, one against and nine abstentions. Amongst the abstentions were the members of the Russian delegation. The day before the Political Commoittee of the Assembly had voted to include the resolution on Ukraine in the final Baku document. Parliamentarians voted by a margin of 92 in favor to 30 against with 27 abstentions on the item.

A press statement by the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly said that the Baku Declaration lent "political support to wide-ranging policy recommendations for the OSCE and its 57 participating States in the fields of political affairs and security, economics, the environment and human rights." The full text of the declaration is available here.

The crisis in Ukraine is among the document's central themes. Among its recommendations on political affairs and security, the Declaration "Express[es] grave concern about the situation in Ukraine and emphasiz[es] the role of the OSCE in engaging all parties in a constructive dialogue, monitoring and supporting the implementation of all OSCE principles and commitments on the ground, preventing further escalation of the crisis and promoting a diplomatic process towards a peaceful resolution to the crisis."

It also calls on Russia to "reverse the annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine," and "condemns the clear, gross and uncorrected violation of the Helsinki principles by the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine, including the particularly egregious violation of that country's sovereignty and territorial integrity."

The resolution, initiated by U.S. Senator Benjamin Cardin, the Deputy Head of the U.S. Delegation, was the focus of an at-times heated parliamentary debate on 1 July.

In its 140 clauses, the Baku Declaration encompasses the resolutions of the PA's three General Committees -- the Committee on Political Affairs and Security; the Committee on Economic Affairs, Science, Technology and Environment; and the Committee on Democracy, Human Rights and Humanitarian Questions.

The Declaration also offers a diverse set of recommendations and pronouncements in the democracy and human rights sphere -- from "deploring" hate crimes against migrant workers to calling for a redoubled fight against anti-Semitism to raising the cases of specific individuals in the OSCE region.

The Declaration "expresses concern at the misuse of administrative procedures and legislation to detain, imprison, intimidate or otherwise silence human rights defenders and critics in numerous OSCE participating States, including Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation." It further "endorses the adoption by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of a resolution confirming the definition of ‘political prisoners.'"

It also calls upon Ukrainian authorities to fully investigate all recent fatalities during the crisis in the country, and particularly in Odessa.

The Declaration also asks the government of Turkmenistan to provide information on the status of persons who have disappeared in the country's prisons.

Several paragraphs focus on Azerbaijan, the host country for this year's OSCE PA Annual Session, including an expression of "deep concern at the situation of Mr. Anar Mammadli" and other "citizens who have been victims of politicized court cases."

See also Baku's Twilight zone: a commentary by commonspace.eu editorial team on the holding of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly annual session in baku and its implications for Azerbaijan (read it here)

source: commonspace.eu with the OSCE PA Press Service.

photo: Parliamentarians from the 57 member states of the OSCE voting for the Baku Declaration at the end of the annual session of their Parliamentary Assembly which ended in Baku on 2 July 2014. (picture courtesy of the OSCE PA).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)