PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN ABKHAZIA

People in Abkhazia go to the polls today to elect a new President. This will be the second election in the territory since the momentous events of August 2008 when Georgia and Russia fought a short five day war, subsequent to which Russia recognised the separatist entities of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent states.

Todays' election comes after the unexpected death of Sergei Bagapsh in May. Three insiders are contesting the election: Vice President Alexandr Ankvab, Prime Minister Sergei Shamba and former Presidential candidate Rauf Khadjimba. The American broadcaster Radio Liberty described Ankvab as "dour, humourless and sarcastic", Shamba as "articulate and politically sophisticated" and Khadjimba as "more polished and measured, and less strident than before". These descriptions are however somewhat artificial. All three candidates are well known to Moscow, Abkhazia's most important - maybe even sole, ally. Russian diplomats have been making it clear that they would not like to interfere with the process and will be happy with whichever one of the three candidates emerges victorious.

Abkhazia is a small society. Politics is polorised around clan loyalties and sources of patronage. The ethnic Abkhaz part of the population is small but determined to be the main political force in the country, A second circle of other ethnic groups, including Russians and Armenians, have generally been in favour of secession from Georgia, but are ambivalent about the future. And finally there are the Georgians. Most of them have been displaced and now live as IDPs in Tbilisi and other parts of Georgia, or in Russia. They will not be voting in this election. In the south of Abkhazia in the Gali region, where the population has always been mainly Georgian farmers, several tens of thousand have returned and co-exist uneasily within the new Abkhaz entity.

Since Abkhazia's  break away from Georgia in 1993 its leadership has not been able to articulate properly its policies towards refugees and IDPs. Allowing them back would mean accepting that Abkhaz will always be a minority in their homeland; not allowing them back would open them to the criticism of the international community that insists on the refugees right to return.

The three Presidential candidates in this election have failed to address the issue properly. One or two of the solutions proposed by candidates during the campaign sounded very close to the policy of "bantustan" adopted by South Africa during the time of apartheid. It is therefore no wonder that whilst many are welcoming todays elections as an important exercise in democracy, others dismiss it as a cynical consequence of the ethnic cleansing that happened after the 1993 war.,

Whoever wins the election is going to have to do better in explaining what the Abkhaz really propose to do in the future on the issue of return of refugees. Otherwise Abkhazia will always remain an abstract concept dependant on Russian soldiers for its exitsance.

This comment was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students in Tbilisi have participated in the campaign LANDMINE FREE SOUTH CAUCASUS 2026. The regional’ Landmine Free South Caucasus’ (LFSC) campaign was initiated by LINKS Europe Foundation in 2018 to address the critical issue of landmine and unexploded ordnance contamination in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. With significant landmine contamination in the region posing an ongoing threat to life and eliciting high economic costs, LFSC advocated for a regional, holistic approach to complete clearance.  Future Doctors Join the Conversation on Friday, 16 October in Tbilisi. "As part of the Landmine Free South Caucasus 2026 campaign, an informative and interactive meeting was held in Tbilisi with medical students. The session was conducted by George Simonishvili, South Caucasus Co-ordinator for LINKS Europe.  The meeting focused on the humanitarian consequences of landmines and other explosive remnants of war in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, with particular attention to the Red Bridge minefield near the borders of the three countries, and emphasised that these dangers remain a current humanitarian challenge. It also underlined that future medical professionals will encounter the long-term effects of explosion injuries and can play a role in awareness and prevention.  Students actively engaged throughout the discussion, showing strong interest in the humanitarian impact and the need for cooperation. Under the slogan "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," the event encouraged students to support public awareness, solidarity with survivors, and a safer South Caucasus free from landmine threats.  The event was organised by LINKS Europe as part of LFSC26.  "Medical Students Stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," "Future Doctors, Safer Futures: Together Against Landmines." "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus".
Editor's choice
News
European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

European Commission Disburses €1.24 Billion to Boost Ukraine’s Defence Industry

The European Commission disbursed €1.24 billion to Ukraine on Wednesday (October 7) under the defence component of the €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan, earmarked for drones, drone interceptors, ammunition, and missiles produced by Ukrainian entities. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the payment would strengthen Ukraine’s defence industry and its ability to protect people and infrastructure. She described Russia’s ongoing attacks as a deliberate strategy intended to make daily life increasingly difficult for Ukrainians. The Ukraine Support Loan provides an indicative €60 billion for defence and €30 billion for budgetary assistance during 2026–2027. The European Commission plans to disburse €28.3 billion for Ukraine’s defence industrial capacity in 2026, with further payments under the defence component expected in the coming weeks. Funding decisions are based on Ukraine’s evolving requirements and remain subject to agreed conditions and monitoring. According to Ukrainian Prime Minister Serhiy Koretskyi, the latest payment brings Ukraine’s defence financing received through the programme to nearly €13 billion. He said the government would continue working with European partners to ensure the remaining planned funding is delivered on schedule and in full For the remainder of 2026, €32.5 billion in EU financial support remains available to Ukraine. This includes €28.1 billion under the Ukraine Support Loan – €15.4 billion for defence industrial capacity and €12.7 billion in budget support. A further €4.4 billion remains available through the Ukraine Facility, bringing the total budget support available for 2026 to more than €17 billion, subject to Ukraine meeting the relevant conditions. Since 2022, the EU and its member states have provided €228.7 billion in overall support to Ukraine, including €3.8 billion generated from immobilised Russian assets.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)