The Politics of Song: When Baku hosts Eurovision 2012 next May at stake will be more than just a song

Baku will host the next Eurovision Song Festival from 22 – 26 May 2012. This will provide both an opportunity and a risk to both Armenia and Azerbaijan as their difficult relationship plays out on an unusual stage. At stake will be more than a simple song.

The first thought that came to the mind of most Azerbaijanis when it was announced that their country had won the 2011 Eurovision Song Festival was what a good opportunity this would be to showcase the new Baku, with all its gleaming new buildings and fairy lights.

A second thought followed soon after however. Will the Armenians participate?

This sums up the quandary of the Azerbaijan government, and the Azerbaijani society in general.  On the one hand they see the Eurovision as an opportunity to show all the best of their country. On the other hand the possibility of Armenian participation presents a number of risks and challenges their strategy that relation with Armenia can only develop after a resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

There are opportunities and risks for Armenia too. Armenian officials have for some time been trying to depict Azerbaijan as a belligerent nation where anti Armenian hysteria is rampant. A successful Armenian participation in the Baku Eurovision would make this narrative more difficult to sustain.

The first reaction from unofficial Armenian sources was that Armenia will not participate. Official Yerevan was however more cautious and said it would study the situation before taking any decision.

In an interview with Echo Muscovy radio station this week, Azerbaijan Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov stated that Azerbaijan will offer all necessary security guarantees to assure Armenian participation in the festival.  In a reaction to this statement the head of the Armenian delegation at the “Eurovision” song contest Gohar Gasparyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.  that Armenia wants to take part in Eurovision Song Contest 2012 in Baku, but Armenia needs serious security guarantees not only from the Azerbaijani side, but also from the European Broadcasting Union.

Many European are bemused by all this interest in Eurovision. The song contest is generally treated as an excuse for a jolly good party. The quality of the songs has for long been criticised as being mediocre, and the voting system as archaic. Nobody takes Eurovision seriously but most enjoy it.

For Armenia and Azerbaijan it is a different story. A successful Armenian participation in Eurovision will go a long way to restoring good people to people contacts between the two countries. The thought that several hundred Armenians will next May arrive in Baku to support their Eurovision entry will be a big setback for the warmongers on both sides, of which there are many. It may be a difficult security operation. Whatever the official positions hotheads and provocateurs may still use the opportunity to create an incident. The Armenian contingent will have to prove itself by an impeccable behaviour, and the host country, and its public, needs to show that the Caucasian tradition that guests are sent by God and should be honoured is respected.

There is a grave responsibility on the European Broadcasting Union. They must understand the importance of this event for the two countries. They must lay down clear and tough ground rules for host and visitor alike. They must ensure that other participants are sensitive to the issues.

The idea of Eurovison Song Contest emerged in the 1950s as a means of bringing Europe together after the slaughter and destruction of World War II.  It is therefore a great opportunity for healing the wounds of the past.

There are risks for both Armenia and Azerbaijan in this matter, but the opportunities are greater. Eurovision can be the start of a new chapter in Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

 

Prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

Photo courtesy of Eurovision TV

(c) commonspace.eu


Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)