"The people of Karabakh are determined to carry on". The Speaker of Parliament of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is in the UK.

The Speaker of Parliament of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, who is currently in Britain as a guest of the British-Armenian Parliamentary Group, on Wednesday (13 June) addressed a group of academics and students from Oxford University at an event organised by the Oxford Armenia Society held at Manchester-Harris College.

Ashot Ghoulian told his audience that over the last twenty years the people of Karabakh had succeeded in rehabilitating their homeland following the conflict. Many reforms had also been implemented, and the basis established for a democratic state. "The people of Karabakh are determined to carry on despite all adversity", Ghoulian said.

Speaking about the insistence of the Karabakh authorities to be represented in the peace process, Ghoulian said that there was no other conflict situation where the main component was not part of the peace process. He said that Karabakh's absence has allowed Azerbaijan to distort the way in which the conflict is presented. The main issue, which is the future of Karabakh, was being marginalised. Instead Azerbaijan was depicting Armenia as the aggressor. Ghoulian insisted that the people of Karabakh must be allowed to determine their own future.

Speaking about the economy Ghoulian said that in recent years Karabakh had identified mining as a source of economic development. It was estimated that there were gold and copper depositis that could last for thirty years. He said that Karabakh at the moment recieves around 40% of its annual budget in the form of loans from Armenia. The figure used to be higher but has now gone down because Karabakh can now generate its own revenues. The loans are paid back from import taxes which Armenia collects on Karabakh's behalf. The authorities in Karabakh have now declared agriculture, ecotourism and the construction of small hydro electric stations as priorities in the economic development of the territory in the immediate future.

Asked about international recognition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Ghoulian said that he regreted no country had recognised NKR as yet. He referred to other partly recognised entities such as Kosovo and Abkhazia and said that their international recognition came as a result of political manoevering. "The day will come when this manoevering will work in favour of Karabakh as well", Ghoulian said. He added that he did not wish Karabakh to be recognised in this way.

Ghoulian said that Karabakh can be a viable state, but that the Karabakh conflict exists, and it poses a threat to regional security. He condemned what he called "Azerbaijani provocations" in the first days of June which had left many young soldiers dead. He mentioned that a number of British NGOs have been trying to deal with the issue of mistrust between the sides through the development of confidence-building measures.

source: commonspace.eu

picture: Ashout Ghoulian, Speaker of Parliament fo the self declared nagorno-Karabakh Republic (archive picture).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)