Not quite detente yet, but it's a start.

Commentary, prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Russian officials delighted with Kerry-Putin meeting, amid nostalgia for cold-war style diplomacy that recognised Russia's superpower status

There is one bit of cold-war nostalgia that senior Russian officials and diplomats constantly hanker for. It is the time when the US and the USSR were the two undisputed superpowers in the world and their two leaders could sit together and decide any issue in the world whilst still holding the nuclear button to each other's head. "Ah, those were the days, when Russians and Americans could talk to each other as equals", some could be heard saying. According to some Russian propoganidsts what has happened since 1991 has been one big misunderstanding. Soon the world will come to its senses, and Russian power will be recognised once more.

This mindset partly explains Russian excitement and glee at yesterday's visit to Sochi of US Secretary of State John Kerry, and his meeting with President Putin - the first since the Ukraine crisis erupted.

Officially, the Kremlin was not euphoric, but it could hardly hide its pleasure either. The Russian News Agency Itar-Tass reported that Russian Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov stated that the Kremlin does not qualify talks of Russian President Vladimir Putin and US Secretary of State John Kerry as a breakthrough, but as first signs of understanding that the two great powers should get their relations back on track. "Our president proceeded in the conversation from our fundamental interest in seeing bilateral relations get back to normal," Ushakov said. "As it was emphasized, it meets the interests of Russia, and we hope the interests of the US, and is extremely important from the point of view of ensuring international stability and security," he added. "Proceeding from this, we consider the talks very useful, necessary and positive," he added.

Ushakov said the talks had been long, open, quite friendly and businesslike. He said Kerry had relayed regards from the U.S. president to Putin. He quoted Kerry as saying President Obama was very interested in Putin's receiving the state secretary. There was no written message, he added. Ushakov also said a meeting of the two countries' leaders was not discussed at talks, although possibilities for that did exist.

Earlier the Russian Foreign Ministry had spelled out the Russian position even more clearly,saying that Russia is ready for constructive interaction with the United States, but on an equal basis.

There is ofcourse much to be said for respect and equality in relations between any two states. That Russia should demand this from the United States is not surprising, nor unreasonable. But there is a sub text to the Russian rhetoric, namely that the United States and Russia should return to a time when they could decide the fate of nations, without these other nations having much say in the matter. A country that has just occupied and annexed part of its neighbours' territory, as Russia did in Crimea last year, may very well seek such a way of doing international relations. The United States must not succumb to these temptations. That is not to say that US diplomacy should not be talking to the Russian side on all issues, at the highest levels. Dialogue is an important part of a process to resolve international crisis. European leaders have also continued talking to the Russians after the start of the Ukraine crisis, and that is not only understandable but also desireable. But there should be no deals on the fate of smaller countries behind their backs.

There are many issues, including on the European continent, which require the goodwill of both Russia and the United States if they are to be resolved. Ukraine is one example, others are Nagorno-Karabakh and other conflicts in the post Soviet space. There is a framework in which these issues need to be discussed and action for their resolution taken - it is the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). One hopes that in their re-energised dialogue Russia and the United States will find time to discuss how they can make the OSCE a meaningful framework once more, and how they can bring in back respect for the principles and norms that underpin that organisation.

This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu.

photo: President Putin greeting US Secretary of State John Kerry in Sochi on Tuesday, 12 May 2015. (picture courtesy of Itar-Tass).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)