Is "more for more" about to become "less for less"?

The European Union is being forced to review its whole strategy towards its Eastern neighbourhood after a series of setbacks in the field of human rights and democratic governance in several of the six partner countries.

When launched, the Eastern Partnership was hailed as a mechanism that would allow the EU's six immediate neighbours: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to benefit from closer relations with the European Union, generous economic assistance and prospects for further integration. The slogan "more for more" was coined - partner countries would benefit more if they do more in the field of reforms, both political and economic.

Over the last months however, the record of several of the six partner countries with respect to human rights, basic freedoms and democratic governance has gone from bad to worse. First there was Belarus with which the European Union has had a troubled relationship for many years. Things came to a head at the Eastern Partnership summit in Warsaw at the end of September when the partner countries refused to join the EU in condemning Belarus. 

There are outstanding issues, and new ones have recently arisin, with the countries of the South Caucasus too.

However, the decision of a Kiev court to sentence former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Timoshenko to seven years imprisonment, turns what has so far been a problem into a crisis. The European Union - together with the US, the UK, Russia and the Secretary General of the UN - have condemned the Kiev judgement and pretty much accused the Ukrainian government of persecuting its opponents. This when Kiev has the Chairmanshiup of the Council of Europe and will soon have the Chairmanship of the OSCE.

The statement from the European Union states clearly that the EU will now need to reflect again on its whole relationship with Ukraine. Whilst the peaceful and orderly transition of power from President Yushenko to President Yanokovich marked a high point in Ukraine's political maturity, Timoshenko's imprisonment is a sign of how much things have deteriorated since.

The European Union cannot ignore events in its Eastern neighbourhood.  It could be that "more for more" may be about to become "less for less".

This comment was prepared by the www.commonspace.eu editorial team

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)