Commentary: Will South Ossetia be Russia's next territorial acquisition?

Commentary:

 

The self-declared Republic of South Ossetia which seceded from Georgia shortly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and which was at the centre of a short but bloody war between Russia and Georgia in 2008, held parliamentary elections during the weekend. Reports from the capital Tskhinvali, quoting sources close to the Central Elections Commission of the territory, say that 21,129 persons voted in the election - 60.4% of the total electorate. The reports suggested that the outright winner was the United Ossetia Party led by Anatoly Bibilov. Bibilov campaigned on a platform of complete unity with Russia and his victory will again raise questions about the status of the territory.

 

The poll has been dismissed as irrelevant both by the Georgian Government as well as the international community in general. South Ossetia's independence is only recognised by Russia and a handful of small countries. However, South Ossetian lilliputian politics have a habit of spiraling quickly into international crisis as happened in 2008. Many see that the platform of the winning party for total unity with Russia may be the percursor for a Russian attempt to formally annexe the territory. South Ossetia is already de facto a Russian protectorate - dependant on Russia for both financial and economic issues, as well as for its defence. Russia's decision to recognise South Ossetia as independent in 2008 caused concerns even inside the Kremlin since the territory is seen as not viable as an indepedent state, and is unlikely to ever be. Russia hoped that by recognising South Ossetia as independent it will resolve the issue of the status of the territory, yet South Ossetian politics - based on family and clan loyalties rather than policy or ideology - have over the last six years proven to be a headache for the Kremlin.

 

People in South Ossetia also consider themselves to be part of the Ossetian nation, most of which is located in the Russian North Caucasus. Calls for unity have been a consistant feature of Ossetian politics. Yet the international context has changed considerably. Until recently hardly anybody would have thought that Russia would provoke international condemnation by changing its international borders and adding territory to its lands. Yet Crimea has proven the extent to which the current leadership in the Kremlin is ready to go in support of its "Great Russia" policy. South Ossetia will hardly constitute a prize addition since Russia effectively controls it anyway. But for the Kremlin the trouble of managing this miniscule state has been considerable. A further complication will emerge once the new Customs Union comes into being later this year. South Ossetia will not be in the Union, yet it is not imaginable that territory can survive if Russia imposes a customs regime with it. Connecting South Ossetia with the Customs Union is going to be necessary and this will raise questions about the position of Nagorno-Karabakh - a territory that is similarly working outside the international system as an unrecognised self-declared Republic. There is increasing controversy and confusion in Armenia about what will happen once Armenia joins the Customs Union. Other members of the Customs Union, such as Belarus and Kazakhstan, are increasingly concerned about the involvement of the self-declared entities into the Customs Union and some fear that their ambiguous status may be abused to flaunt the rules of the new Union.

 

For Russia therefore annexing South Ossetia would be a clean solution, and one that is clearly supported by the tiny population that still lives in the territory. Yet this is unlikely to happen since Russia is wary of further provoking the anger of the international community. South Ossetia is therefore likely to remain in a state of limbo for a long time - an irritant for Georgia, a headache for the Kremlin and a puzzle for diplomats to argue on.

 

source: This commentary was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

 

Photo: Ossetians displaying a Russian and Ossetian flag during celebrations following Russia's recognition of South Ossetian independence in 2008. (p[icture courtesy of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty).

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
European Council calls for an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts

European Council calls for an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts

The European Council approved on Tuesday (7 May) conclusions on the 2023 annual report on the implementation of the European Union’s External Action Instruments in 2022. It commends the steps taken by the EU in the current challenging geopolitical context, marked by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, conflict in the Middle East and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, among others. The Council welcomes the report’s emphasis on the key support provided by the EU to Ukraine and neighbouring countries affected by Russia’s war of aggression, as well as efforts to address the regional and global consequences and its impact on the most vulnerable groups, in particular with regard to food and energy security. In this context, the Council encourages the Commission to continue highlighting the EU’s support to tackle global challenges. It underlines the necessity to continue working towards an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts, including through the EU’s external action instruments. Preventing conflict through timely analysis and early action, supporting peace mediation and dialogue, building peace and resilience, and forging international and regional partnerships in the area of peace, security and defence are key aspects in this regard.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
European Council calls for an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts

European Council calls for an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts

The European Council approved on Tuesday (7 May) conclusions on the 2023 annual report on the implementation of the European Union’s External Action Instruments in 2022. It commends the steps taken by the EU in the current challenging geopolitical context, marked by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, conflict in the Middle East and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, among others. The Council welcomes the report’s emphasis on the key support provided by the EU to Ukraine and neighbouring countries affected by Russia’s war of aggression, as well as efforts to address the regional and global consequences and its impact on the most vulnerable groups, in particular with regard to food and energy security. In this context, the Council encourages the Commission to continue highlighting the EU’s support to tackle global challenges. It underlines the necessity to continue working towards an integrated and coherent EU response to external crises and conflicts, including through the EU’s external action instruments. Preventing conflict through timely analysis and early action, supporting peace mediation and dialogue, building peace and resilience, and forging international and regional partnerships in the area of peace, security and defence are key aspects in this regard.