Commentary: A shaken EU fires opening shots in long war of attrition with Belarus

By EU standards it was swift and strong. The united European response to the brazen Belarusian snatching of an opposition figure from a commercial airplane of a European airline flying between two European capitals came only within a day of the incident.

On Sunday, Belarus ordered a civilian Ryanair plane flying from Athens to Vilnius to land in Minsk citing a bomb threat. Belarusian military aircraft buzzed the plane in case the pilot decided not to comply. On the ground several passengers, including one known critic of the regime of Alexandre Lukashenko were taken off the plane and arrested. Governments and public opinion across the world were outraged. The condemnation within the EU was swift and universal.

read more: Editorial On Belarus the EU must now act quickly and decisively 

By Monday, EU leaders attending a scheduled summit in Brussels had agreed to turn the words into action: they demanded the immediate release of Raman Pratasevich and Sofia Sapega and that their freedom of movement be guaranteed; they called on the International Civil Aviation Organization to urgently investigate this unprecedented and unacceptable incident; they decided to start the process of implementing targeted sanctions, including further economic sanctions; and they started the process of isolating Belarus from the world of aviation calling on all EU-based carriers to avoid overflight of Belarus and launching measures to ban overflight of EU airspace by Belarusian airlines and prevent access to EU airports of flights operated by such airlines.

Nothing dramatic will happen overnight as a result, but make no mistake about it, this was the opening shot of what is likely to be a long and messy war of attrition against Belarus that may last for years. Like a big elephant the European Union is a strong international player, but moves rather awkwardly. But on Belarus now, the EU's mind is set. The process will start and will be sustained.

The impact on Belarus will, despite all of Lukashenko's bravado, be severe. It will not be fatal for one simple reason: Russia does not want Belarus to drift towards the west. They will therefore always throw a lifeline to Lukashenko - at least until they can find a reliable substitute. But the relationship between Moscow and Minsk will not get any better as a result of this crisis. Belarus, increasingly isolated will become even more dependant on Russia than has been the case so far. Moscow on its part is trying to manage an already complicated situation with the west. This latest drama may or may not have been part of Putin's script, but even if it was, may have already escalated more than anticipated.

For the moment, Raman Pratasevich remains in a Belarus prison. A televised confession released by the Belarus authorities on Monday, shows clearly it was done under duress. His abduction may however be a game-changer for Belarus. But it will take time.

source: This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu
photo: The leaders of the 27 member states of the EU meeting at a European Council meeting in Brussels on 24 May 2021
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular