Blessed are the peacemakers! Having flooded the region with billions of dollars-worth of modern weapons, President Putin will now try to persuade Armenia and Azerbaijan not to use them against each other.

It has now been confirmed that the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet tomorrow (Sunday, 10 August) in Sochi under the auspices of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting comes after more than ten days of violence on the line of contact and international border separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces, which has seen dozens of people killed and wounded. Both sides have been using blood-curling language in the war of words that has accompanied the fighting on the ground. The background to the Sochi talks is as a result tense and very difficult.

One can therefore only admire President Putin for bringing the two Presidents together, and wish him success in his endeavour. Blessed are the peacemakers!

The Russian President's motives however may not all be altruistic. A conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan at this point will be inconvenient for Russia. However, having supplied both sides with billions of dollars-worth of modern weapons over the last few years President Putin will now have to make sure that they do not use them against each other. Well not too much anyway. But like when you give a child a toy, you cannot then expect him not to play with it.

The Karabakh problem  has also become a serious obstacle to President Putin's grand design for building a Eurasian Union. Azerbaijan has raised serious questions about the proposed Armenian membership, and particularly the status of Nagorno-Karabakh itself within the common customs space of the Union. Kazakhstan and Belarus, the other two members of the Eurasian Union, to different degrees and in different ways, have echoed the Azerbaijani concerns. Putin's ultimate aim is to get both Armenia and Azerbaijan into the Eurasian Union. The only chance that can happen is if an arrangement on Karabakh can be worked out first. That seems a far off prospect. Putin will use his usual charm - which is very different from that of his predecessor Dimitri Medvedev, who also tried to deal with the problem after 2008. Putin's charm usually comes with a generous doze of arms twisting. If he cannot get both countries to join Putin will want to make sure that at least the Armenian membership now proceeds without further delays.

Absent in Sochi will be the cuadrilla of the OSCE Minsk Group co-Chair and the Special Representative of the OSCE Chairman. They have been unceremoniously excluded from the process. So much for all the statements of the international community, recognising the Minsk Process as the sole negotiating forum for resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. However if the Sochi meeting succeeds, the demise of the Minsk Group will be a very cheap price to pay. That unfortunately is unlikely. There may be some movement to please Mr Putin, and also to unblock any obstacles about the Armenian membership of the Eurasian Union. If things are really good there may even be a statement, as was in November 2008 in Moscow. The real proof of success will however be the situation on the ground. That is where Mr Putin's power of persuasion will be tested.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

Photo: President Putin of Russia hunting with a sniper gun. (archive picture)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
ANAMA hosts 4th International Mine Action Conference in Baku

ANAMA hosts 4th International Mine Action Conference in Baku

The 4th International Mine Action Conference is taking place in Baku, Azerbaijan, on 2 - 3 September 2026. The event is hosted by ANAMA, the Azerbaijani Mine action agency and the United Nations. The conference, which attracts hundreds of particpants from all over the world, opened with a message from president Ilham Aliyev, delivered to the coonference by senior presidential administration official, Hikmet Hajiyev. The theme of the conference is HUMANITARIAN DEMINING FOR URBAN RECOVERY; SETTING STANDARDS OF EXCELLENCE FOR SAFE SETTLEMENTS. President Aliyev in his message said, "Unfortunately, mines and unexploded ordnance continue to threaten human life and security in many countries around the world. Long after conflicts have ended, explosive ordnance continues to cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to infrastructure and delay reconstruction projects. In this regard, humanitarian demining is an essential commitment to safe settlements. Urban reconstruction in post-conflict areas requires the restoration of buildings, roads and public infrastructure, as well as the establishment of security and confidence. No city, village or town can be fully rebuilt, no school or hospital can function safely, no family can return to their homes with dignity, and no economic activity can develop sustainably until the land is cleared of mines and explosive remnants of war. Humanitarian demining is therefore at the heart of urban reconstruction and the creation of safe settlements. (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)