Blessed are the peacemakers! Having flooded the region with billions of dollars-worth of modern weapons, President Putin will now try to persuade Armenia and Azerbaijan not to use them against each other.

It has now been confirmed that the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet tomorrow (Sunday, 10 August) in Sochi under the auspices of the Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting comes after more than ten days of violence on the line of contact and international border separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces, which has seen dozens of people killed and wounded. Both sides have been using blood-curling language in the war of words that has accompanied the fighting on the ground. The background to the Sochi talks is as a result tense and very difficult.

One can therefore only admire President Putin for bringing the two Presidents together, and wish him success in his endeavour. Blessed are the peacemakers!

The Russian President's motives however may not all be altruistic. A conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan at this point will be inconvenient for Russia. However, having supplied both sides with billions of dollars-worth of modern weapons over the last few years President Putin will now have to make sure that they do not use them against each other. Well not too much anyway. But like when you give a child a toy, you cannot then expect him not to play with it.

The Karabakh problem  has also become a serious obstacle to President Putin's grand design for building a Eurasian Union. Azerbaijan has raised serious questions about the proposed Armenian membership, and particularly the status of Nagorno-Karabakh itself within the common customs space of the Union. Kazakhstan and Belarus, the other two members of the Eurasian Union, to different degrees and in different ways, have echoed the Azerbaijani concerns. Putin's ultimate aim is to get both Armenia and Azerbaijan into the Eurasian Union. The only chance that can happen is if an arrangement on Karabakh can be worked out first. That seems a far off prospect. Putin will use his usual charm - which is very different from that of his predecessor Dimitri Medvedev, who also tried to deal with the problem after 2008. Putin's charm usually comes with a generous doze of arms twisting. If he cannot get both countries to join Putin will want to make sure that at least the Armenian membership now proceeds without further delays.

Absent in Sochi will be the cuadrilla of the OSCE Minsk Group co-Chair and the Special Representative of the OSCE Chairman. They have been unceremoniously excluded from the process. So much for all the statements of the international community, recognising the Minsk Process as the sole negotiating forum for resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. However if the Sochi meeting succeeds, the demise of the Minsk Group will be a very cheap price to pay. That unfortunately is unlikely. There may be some movement to please Mr Putin, and also to unblock any obstacles about the Armenian membership of the Eurasian Union. If things are really good there may even be a statement, as was in November 2008 in Moscow. The real proof of success will however be the situation on the ground. That is where Mr Putin's power of persuasion will be tested.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

Photo: President Putin of Russia hunting with a sniper gun. (archive picture)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)