ARMENIA-ENERGY

In the middle of August 2011 the German C.A.C. (Chemieanlagenbau Chemnitz GmbH) company will submit to the Armenian party the programme on management of "Nairit Plant" CJSC, the only producer of chroloprene rubber in the CIS, press-secretary of Armenian Energy and Natural Resources Ministry, Lusine Harutyunyan, told Arminfo correspondent.

She also added that at the end of July representatives of C.A.C.  visited Armenia and met the leadership of the Ministry as well as "Nairit Plant" CJSC. They promised to submit the management and rehabilitation programme of the plant to the Armenian party in two weeks.

As it was earlier informed, Nairit's shareholders and creditor, the CIS InterStateBank, have drafted an anti-crisis program worth $500mln with $100mln to be spent on the repayment of debts to InterStateBank and $400mln - on development. $400mln will be borrowed from EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund while the rest will be invested by the managing company. The assets of the plant and its major shareholder, Rhinoville Property, have been given to InterStateBank as security against its loan.

Nairit has been idle since Apr 2010. Its full capacity is 9,000-10,000 tons of acetylene rubber and 25,000-26,000 tons of butadiene rubber. The development program stipulates the restart of the chloroprene rubber production. As a result, the plant will produce 25,000-30,000 tons of rubber a year or 6-8% of the world production against 10-12% in the late 1980s.

Rhinoville Property Limited owns 89.999% of Nairit Plant's shares, the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of Armenia - 4.496%, Armgasprom CJSC - 3.596%, Yerevan Thermal Power Plant CJSC - 1.907%.  In 2010 the plant's loss totalled 24.6bln AMD against 20.3bln AMD in 2009. The authorized capital totalled 27.307bln AMD, own capital and liabilities - 84.552bln AMD against 93.633bln AMD in 2009.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)