Opinion - UNPEELING THE ONION: Dennis Sammut wonders why Vladimir Kazimirov is focussing on a very narrow part of the Karabakh story.

This website (commonspace.eu), today published an interview with Vladimir Kazimirov the veteran Russian diplomat who for many years was the key Russian point man on the Karabakh conflict. Kazimirov in today’s interview strongly criticises Baku for the way it is handling the conflict settlement process. The interview is unprecedented in its tone, given who is giving it.

I met Kazimirov on many ocassions, and have found him to be an able and charismatic diplomat of the old school. He came to Baku a few years ago at the invitation of LINKS to speak about the Karabakh conflict. It was an odd affair, attended by senior Azerbaijan government officials including Novruz Mammedov the president’s foreign policy advisor and a number of western ambassadors. As Kazimirov was about to speak five members of the so called “Karabakh Liberation Organisation” KLO disrupted the meeting and started haranguing Kazimirov. This went on for fifteen minutes. There was no violence, and they left quietly, even apologetically after they made their point, and the meeting continued as if nothing had happened.

Meetings attended by Senior state officials are not interrupted in this way often in Baku, and later on I wondered why everybody  remained so calm and composed. But then I have learned a long time ago not to take things at face value in the Caucasus. There is always another angle of the story that one has to look at. In any case it was clear that there was no love lost between Kazimirov and Azerbaijan, and things seem to have taken a turn for the worse this summer as the propaganda war heated up after the failure at Kazan.

But back to Kazimirov’s interview. It sheds light on one or two asspects of the Karabakh conflict settlement process. Kazimirov in this regard has provided a mini Russian version of Wikileaks. Unusually for a Russian diplomat he has written and spoken about his days as the key Russian diplomat dealing with the issue much more than his western counterparts ever did. The commonspace interview is in this mode too, as was an earlier interview he gave to the website in June. In as much as Kazimirov is opening up what has been nearly twenty years of secret negotiations on Karababkh one can only welcome his contribution.

Kazimirov however goes further. He takes exception to the way Baku has been spinning the conflict and conflict settlement process, and in rather strong language. A lot of what he says may or may not be true – I can only judge on the public side of things since unlike Kazimirov I was never directly involved in the negotiations. But what he is saying is clearly a very narrow part of the story. It is not what Kazimirov is saying that I am worried about, it is what he is not saying. And I wonder why?

The Karabakh conflict is like an onion. You unpeel one layer only to find that there are many others left to go. Kazimirov has unpeeled one layer of the onion and thinks that the job is done. Far from it.

 

(c) commonspace.eu

Dennis Sammut is the Executive Director of LINKS and a regular contributor to the international media on issues related to the Caucasus and European security. he may be contacted at www.links-dar.org

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Situation in South Yemen strains relations between Saudi Arabia and UAE

Situation in South Yemen strains relations between Saudi Arabia and UAE

The relations between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are increasingly strained as a result of the different approach of the two countries towards Yemen. Whilst both countries were initially together in resisting the Houthi take over in Yemen, the UAE subsequently focused on the South of the country, backing the Southern Movement (STC), which seeks to restore the independence of South Yemen. South Yemen became an independent country in 1967, at the end of British rule, and only unified with the north in 1990. The Saudi-led “Coalition to Support Legitimacy in Yemen” on Tuesday, 30 December, said it conducted a “limited” airstrike targeting two ships “that smuggled weapons and other military hardware into Mukalla in southern Yemen”. The ships originated in the UAE port of Furjeirah. In a statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), the Coalition Forces spokesman, Major General Turki Al-Maliki, said that two ships coming from the port of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates entered the Port of Mukalla in Hadramaut without obtaining official permits from the Joint Forces Command of the Coalition. He stressed the Coalition's "continued commitment to de-escalation and enforcing calm in the governorates of Hadramawt and Al-Mahra, and to prevent any military support from any country to any Yemeni faction without coordination with the legitimate Yemeni government and the Coalition. The Southern Transitional Council (STC), launched a sweeping military campaign early in December, seizing the governorates of Hadramaut along the Saudi border and the eastern governorate of Al-Mahra in Yemen’s border with Oman. The UAE-backed STC forces captured the city of Seiyun, including its international airport and the presidential palace. They also took control of the strategic PetroMasila oilfields, which account for a massive portion of Yemen’s remaining oil wealth. (click the image to read the article in full).

Popular