Netanyahu declares victory over Iran, rules out Lebanon withdrawal

The Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has hailed a historic victory over Iran and ruled out an immediate withdrawal from Lebanon on Monday (15 June). He said that Israel’s forces would remain there “for as long as necessary”.

“We established deep security zones around the state of Israel. We did this in Gaza, in Lebanon and in Syria,” the Israeli prime minister said in a televised press conference on Monday. “And I want to make it clear: we will remain in these security zones … to protect our country.”

He claimed that the US-Israeli war against Iran had spared Israel from “nuclear annihilation”, and that the destruction and timing of the campaign was necessary in order to prevent Iran from having nuclear weapons. 

The exact details of the interim deal between the US and Iran are still unclear. The Guardian reports that it might “include a ceasefire in Lebanon, where Israel launched a wide-ranging offensive after attacks on northern Israel by Hezbollah at the beginning of the 15-week-long conflict”.

US officials said on Monday (15 June) that the withdrawal of Israeli forces was not a condition of a pact between the US ‌and ‌Iran, and Israel would have the right to defend itself against attacks by Hezbollah. It should be noted that details of the Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Iran are still very much unclear, and JD Vance said that the framework is ‘very general’ with many details yet to be negotiated.

“The MoU … is about a page and half so it ‌is a very general document,” Vance said on CNN on Monday night. “On a number of issues, we are going to have ‌to figure this stuff out during the technical negotiation phase.”

Israeli media has framed the outcome as an “abject failure”. Israel had strongly opposed Iranian attempts to make any interim agreement with the US conditional on ending Israeli strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Opposition figures in Israel have also moved quickly to criticise the deal. With elections due before October, and the race expected to be closely contested, the agreement is likely to become a major political issue. Netanyahu said on Monday that he intended to stand in the election and win.

Yair Golan, leader of the centre-left Democrats, accused Netanyahu of allowing “military achievements won through the courage of [Israel’s armed forces] to be erased”.

“Trump signs an agreement that funnels billions to the ayatollahs’ regime, leaves the nuclear infrastructure intact, preserves the ballistic [missile] threat as it is, and throws a lifeline to the murderous regime in Tehran,” Golan said.

Naftali Bennett, the former prime minister and one of Netanyahu’s main challengers in the upcoming election, said Netanyahu was “incapable of achieving a decisive victory” and had dragged Israel into wars of “stagnation and attrition”.

Far-right members of Netanyahu’s governing coalition urged Israel to disregard the terms of the deal, arguing that the country had not taken part in the negotiations and was therefore not bound by the agreement.

“We are not party to this agreement. It does not safeguard our security,” National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir wrote on Telegram.

Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)