Global militarization index report shows militarization of Azerbaijan, Armenia

The Bonn international center of conversion has published the annual ‘Global militarization index’.

According to it, Azerbaijan is among top ten of the most militarized countries of the world.

According to Newsru, the militarization index is defined as correlation of the defence budget of the state and its gross domestic product.

Also the costs for education, public health and a number of other factors are taken into account.

The document notes the rapid armament of Azerbaijan and Armenia which gives the ground to fear the resumption of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Other dangerous points are related to territorial disputes towards China and its neighbors.

Though China is 82 by the degree of militarization, its military budget of $129m is second in the world.

Turkey is 24th with 609 points, Iraq is 26th, Egypt is 28th. United States with the highest defence budget in the world has the militarization rating of $689bn-29th place with 591 points.

News.Az

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)