Commentary: A team fit for purpose

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise, a weekly newsletter published in association with commonspace.eu

After a convincing victory in last October's parliamentary elections, the Georgian Dream party over the last days set about assigning posts in the new Parliament and Government. For the first time the party will govern alone, and not in coalition with other parties as was the case in 2012-16. Also a huge parliamentary majority means the party can not only rely on a stable government for the coming four years, but is also able to push through any constitutional changes that it feels are necessary.

The team presented by prime minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili retains many of those who were in Cabinet prior to the elections, but there are some significant changes. Kvirikashvili is determined to make the economy the cornerstone of his administration. He has moved Dimitri Kumsishvili to head the Ministry of Finance, whilst retaining the post of first deputy prime Minister. Kumsishvili will have to deal quickly with the challenge of stabilising the national currency, the lari, which has been under pressure since the election. The appointment of Giorgi Gakharaia as the new Minister of Economic Development has been widely welcomed by Georgia's business community, who see Gakharaia as competent and trustworthy. Zurab Alavidze is the new Minister for regional development and infrastructure - a key sector for Georgia's next stage of development.

Kvirikashvili has also strengthened his foreign affairs team. Whilst the foreign minister Mikheil Janelidze retained his post, Victor Dolidze has been appointed as Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration, replacing David Bakradze who will be Georgia's new Ambassador to the United States. Dolidze, who was until the elections a member of the Free Democrats served as Chairman of the European Affairs Committee in the previous parliament. He is highly regarded in European circles and his appointment has been warmly welcomed in the European parliament and other EU circles in Brussels.

Kvirikashvili has decided to maintain the same people in the defence, internal affairs and security sectors. The heads of these Ministries and entities were widely praised for their professionalism during the tense days of the election campaign.
Kakha Kaladze retains his post as deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Energy. Kaladze - known up to 2012 for his career as a footballer, has grown in the job, and in the election campaign, as head of the Georgian Dream election team he emerged as an able political operator. He was praised for his television appearances, and his ability to forge together an impressive election machine. Other ministers such as Justice Minister Tea Tsulukiani and Minister for refugees and displaced persons, Sozar Subari who were an important part of the outgoing Ministerial team retain their posts.

Parallel to the Ministerial appointments, which are subject to parliamentary approval, Georgian Dream MPs have also agreed on appointments for the officers of the new parliament. The election of Irakli Kobakhidze as the new Chairman of Parliament is significant. Kobakhidze replaces David Usupashvili who fought the elections with the Republican party which performed very badly in the poll and did not secure seats in the parliament. It is widely recognised that Usupashvili is a hard act to follow as Chairman of Parliament. However, whilst lacking parliamentary experience, Kobakhidze is a political heavyweight in the Georgian Dream party. This is important as the new parliament will have a dual task of both providing the government with political support and enacting government legislation in an efficient and timely manner, whilst at the same providing parliamentary oversight, necessary to ensure the necessary check and balances. Parliament will be the first place where the government will be held to account for the promises it has made prior to the elections.

Here too Georgian Dream has opted for a mix of veterans from the previous parliament and a wave of new and highly qualified MPs from amongst who Georgia's future leaders are likely to emerge. The new First Deputy Chairman of Parliament Tamar Chugoshvili, the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Sopo Katsarava, the chair of the Committee for Human Rights and Civil Integration - Sopo Kiladze, and the chair of the Committee for European Integration, Tamar Khulordava, are part of an impressive crop of women MPs who now have strategic positions within the legislature.

Long-time observers of Georgia say that this is likely the most competent and able government and legislature that Georgia has ever had in its short history as an independent country since 1991. There is also an eagerness within the new government of wanting now to get on with the job of addressing some of the key issues that face the country. And the tasks ahead are far from easy.

The pressure on Kvirikashvili and his government to deliver on key economic objectives of making significant structural improvements to the economy that would guarantee for all Georgians a better quality of life is high, and Kvirikashvili is likely to be judged on his achievement in this sector.

In foreign affairs, managing relations with its large neighbour Russia, whilst anchoring Georgia in the European and Euro-Atlantic family at a time when both Washington and Brussels are increasingly introspective will require all the diplomatic skills and ingenuity that the Georgians can muster.

Internally Georgia now faces a period of democratic consolidation. Concerns about slippage in past achievements on human rights and democratic values, and of Georgian Dream abusing its constitutional majority have been unnecessarily exaggerated by critics of the government, and their friends in the international media. There is no sign of this happening yet. But Georgia remains a young democracy, and there can be no room for complacency on these issues.

The new Georgian Dream political leadership team is fit for purpose, but the challenges ahead should not be underestimated. The party will do well to put in place transparent and democratic processes to deal with issues as they arise, to ensure that internal political harmony will provide the country's leadership with a space for open and comprehensive debate on policies, whilst maintaining the necessary discipline and cohesion that large majorities often imperil.

This is a commentary prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise, a weekly newsletter published in association with commonspace.eu

photo: members of the new Georgian Cabinet of Ministers being presented on Tuesday, 22 November 2016

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)