Commentary: The political significance of Pope Francis' visit to Georgia and Azerbaijan

Commonspace.eu political editor commented on the political significance of Pope Francis' visit to Georgia and Azerbaijan

The Caucasus is a complex region at the crossroads between continents, cultures and civilisations. The visit of Pope Francis will bring forth some of the many issues.

The Pope's first stop will be Georgia, an Orthodox country with a long and distinguished history. Georgia's biggest challenge is its relations with its large neighbour Russia. Russia harbours hegemonic ambitions over Georgia, seen most vividly during the 2008 war between the two countries and Russia's subsequent creation of protectorates in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Georgian territories that want to secede from Georgia. Relations remain tense and the two countries do not have diplomatic relations. The Pope is likely to make a reference to the tens of thousands of displaced Georgians, victims of the wars in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, as part of a more general reference to the refugee crisis in Europe.

Pope Francis arrives in Georgia one week before the country goes to the polls in competitive elections to choose a new parliament. It is a bit puzzling why Vatican diplomacy acquiesced, or probably even proposed, these dates so close to elections. The visit of Pope Francis is not controversial in a political context. But in Georgia politics and religion often interphase, and the presence of elements of hard line orthodox priests and their followers who have made insulting statements directed at the Pope raises the risk of the visit getting entangled in the political debate.
But Georgia is today a very different country then only a decade ago. It is most appropriate that a reformist Pope visits a country that has embraced reforms and is trying to implement them as part of an ongoing process towards European and Euro-Atlantic integration. The visit of the Pope is another affirmation of Georgia's western orientation, and of the readiness of the majority of the leadership of the Georgian Orthodox Church to embrace openness and dialogue.

From Georgia the Pope will go to Azerbaijan, a secular country with a largely Muslim population. It is not often that the Head of the catholic Church can visit a Shia Muslim country. Azerbaijan is a keen supporter of the dialogue between cultures and civilisations, and is sensitive to incidences of Islamophobia in Europe. According to Agenzia Fides, the news agency of the Vatican, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, speaking on the eve of the Pope's visit denounced the risk of a resurgence of fascism in the heart of the Old Continent. Speaking at the 5th International Humanitarian Forum being held in Baku, President Aliev said "some politicians and experts in the world are building a negative image of Islam by linking it with terror and at the same time forgetting to say that terrorism mainly affects Islamic countries".

Azerbaijan has just held a referendum on constitutional changes. The Pope's visit only days after the referendum has also raised some concerns.

Vatican diplomacy is very thorough and sophisticated, and one can only think that the decision to visit Georgia and Azerbaijan so close to sensitive ballots indicates that the Vatican thinks the visit to the two countries is important enough to justify the risks. The Pope visited Armenia in June. The Vatican hopes that the papal visits to the South Caucasus will highlight the importance of the region and the need for peace and dialogue.

source: This is a commentary prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

photo: Pope Francis and Georgian president Giorgi Marghvelashvili during the latter's visit to the Vatican in April 2016.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)