Commentary: Georgia's successful fight against COVID-19

In this commentary on commonspace.eu Ghia Abashidze says that tough early measures and national solidarity have helped Georgia keep the covid-19 virus under control.

In the last few weeks many leading international media outlets, diplomats and politicians have highlighted Georgia's unexpected success and effectiveness in the fight against the spread of the COVID-19 virus.  In Georgia those who have been opposing the Georgian Dream (GD) government for previous mistakes and failures have unexpectedly started to praise actions implemented by the Giorgi Gakharia-led Cabinet. The exception remains ex-president Mikheil Saakashvili's, United National Movement and its media-sources, who have been accused of spreading disinformation and panic.

There were a number of steps and measures undertaken by the Georgian Dream government that help explain the unusual Georgian trajectory. There were early restrictive but necessary measure which turned out to be beneficial for Georgians.  By April 13 data, Georgia has reported a total of 296 cases of the new Coronavirus. There have been three deaths - all were women, aged 79 to 86,  with underlying health conditions. 

The country introduced some travel restrictions as early as January 28, long before  other European states. This included stopping all flights from China, and introducing medical checks at Tbilisi airport. Those decisive actions were praised by the World Health Organisation (WHO).  Soon further restrictions were introduced, such as the early cancellation of major sporting and cultural events, and closing ski resorts, stadiums, restaurants and bars. Also early steps were taken in mid-March to shut down education institutions, with teaching replaced by online lectures and lessons, and restricting public gatherings.

Simultaneously, measures were put in place to cushion the economy, an economic rescue plan was launched, and the state budget  was revised dramatically.

On March 31, new restrictions were introduced including a curfew between 21:00 - 06:00 , with heavy fines - up to $1000 for individuals and  $5000 for entities - for those who violate the rules. Public transportation (both municipal and intercity) was suspended; gatherings of more than 3 people banned except for essential grocery stores and pharmacies, where citizens have to observe social distancing; people aged 70 and more were banned from leaving homes except for going to their closest groceries/pharmacies/hospitals; checkpoints for thermal screening of citizens were set up in major cities; and several municipalities are now under total lockdown, controlled by police and defence forces.

The government has been very careful in the way it has managed the message to the population. A dedicated multi-language website (StopCov.ge) was launched to communicate directly with citizens. Daily press briefings by government officials and senior medics' became an essential part of life for many Georgians. Additional to the local emergency centre, several free hotlines were launched by  different agencies. Doctors and specialists are providing free online-consultation for those in Georgia,  and they also assist compatriots abroad. Treatment for COVID-19 at hospitals is free in addition to emergency regular medical care, which the government had introduced  years ago. 

The founder of the ruling Georgian Dream party, former prime minister, Bidzina Ivanishvili, a billionaire  with a long history of philanthropy in Georgia, transferred 100 million GEL (about $ 32 million) to the StopCov Fund which was created to cope with challenges sparked by the Coronavirus. Businesses and individuals are donating money to this fund. Also, the ruling party and few others from the opposition flank have provided daily help to needy segments of society. In these challenging times, special foreign assistance came in from USA, EU and international financial organizations, as well as other friendly countries. 

The prominent role played by medical professionals has led many  Georgians to say that since January, Georgia's de facto leaders are the heads of the Centre for Disease Control (CDC). A governmental task force was established in that month with the participation of the CDC and the country's top officials.

From April, within the framework of  a joint project of the Education Ministry  and the Public Broadcaster, School TV was launched with online lessons covering all the subjects that are included in the National Curriculum.  Recently, the project was praised by European Broadcasters Union (EBU) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) which stressed that the model of distance learning introduced in Georgia over the past month is one of the most successful projects in the world.

Since lockdown many Georgians stranded outside are being returned gradually by the national airline, following a strict protocol established by the WHO. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs managed to return more than 5000 Georgians and the process in ongoing. Returnees are checked and sent for a fortnight either to quarantined hotels and spa resorts, or if they have relevant self-isolation space  - medics visit their residences prior to arrival - to their homes which are aslo strictly monitored.  It is important to note the unique and comfortable Georgian model of hotel  quarantine. Almost all big hotels in the country have voluntarily provided their buildings for returnees. Several rejected state subsidies for accommodation and meals, many others provide their rooms with generous discounts. The government pays 14-day stay at hotels.  

Additionally, round 80 persons with suspicious symptoms were transferred from Russian-occupied breakaway territories to Georgia-proper in this period.  

There is also an unusual situation in prisons. More than 800 Georgian penitentiary system staff members volunteered to confine themselves to the prison estates during the emergency, and over the last weeks they work and live in jails. The government provides them with tent accommodation and free meals. Court hearings are currently held online.

At the time of writing this article, the Georgian Orthodox Church unlike its Orthodox Sister churches, has resisted calls to restrict upcoming Holy Week services, and Easter which in Georgia is celebrated on April 19. On Palm Sunday (12 April), boxwood trees were not on sale this year, as was the usual tradition. However, in some churches they were available and police were enforcing social distancing rules. Later, the Government stated that lockdown "curfew" rules applies to  everyone, and the state will not tolerate  anyone ignoring them, This will be particularly pertinent this Saturday night when some parishoners will be tempted to ignore curfew rules and attend midnight church services.

In summary, the pace of the spread of COVID-19 in Georgia appears to be under control. The peak of the virus is expected to be in next two weeks. Let us hope and wish that the so-called Church-cluster will not occur, and common sense will prevail.  

source: This commentary was prepared for commonspace.eu by Ghia Abashidze is a Tbilisi based and UK educated political analyst and opinion shaper. He previously worked with the European institutions in Georgia. 

photo: Georgian security forces enforce a curfew as part of government measures to con tain the spread of covid-19

 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)