Commentary: EU's close engagement with the South Caucasus is ambitious and long lasting

This is a commentary prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

On Thursday, (13 June) the European Union held high level consultations with Armenia and Azerbaijan.

In Baku, Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev met with the EU Commissioner for Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy, Johannes Hahn, whilst nearly at the same time in Brussels, EU High Representative, Federica Morgherini was meeting with Armenian Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan.

Traditionally EU relations with Georgia have been close and deep, even if not without problems. The Association Agreement signed between Georgia and the EU offers the highest level of co-operation possible to a non-candidate country, and provides a very solid basis for EU-Georgian relations going forward. With Armenia and Azerbaijan the pattern of relations has been somewhat more chequered. But in recent years relations have improved considerably, to the point where we can say that they are excellent, which does not mean however that there are not yet problems and issues to be resolved.

In Brussels yesterday, the second Partnership Council meeting between the European Union and Armenia "reaffirmed the commitment of the EU and Armenia to implement effectively the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA). This ambitious agreement can play an important role for the modernisation of Armenia, in particular through legislative approximation to EU norms in many sectors. The Council highlighted the paramount importance of the rule of law and respect for human rights, which includes an independent, efficient and accountable justice system."

The European Union has looked sympathetically at the efforts of the new Armenian leadership, led by Nikol Pashinyan, to implement reforms in many sectors. One of these sectors is judicial reform. Here the Partnership Council underlined the importance of an independent, efficient and accountable judiciary which contributes not only to the protection of human rights but also to a business environment favourable to economic development and foreign investment. "The Council welcomed the current efforts aiming at comprehensive judicial reform in Armenia in accordance with the Armenian Constitution and with international standards. Following the launch of an EU-Armenia dialogue on judicial reform in September 2018 the EU stands ready to provide further support for comprehensive judicial reform based on a justice reform strategy." This is not a blank check for the government of Armenia to do what it wants, and should not be read as such. It is a genuine expression of understanding of the difficulties that Armenia faces in this sector, and an offer to use best practices to assist it in dealing with them.

Armenia has high expectations as to what the EU can do to help it economically. It is unlikely that these expectations can ever be fulfilled in full. Yet here also, the EU's hand of help has been generous, consistent and without geo-political strings. Many in Armenia, even if not all, appreciate this.

The meeting between the president of Azerbaijan and Commissioner Johannes Hahn, also yesterday, comes at an important moment in EU-Azerbaijan relations. Relations are better than they have been for many years, but both sides are willing, indeed determined, to move them even more forward. The prospect of a new contractual agreement between Azerbaijan and the EU is now definitely on the horizon. Azerbaijan sees its role as an energy provider from its own natural resources -  and as a hub for the transportation and transit of those of others further afield - as key factors in determining its relations with the EU. But both sides appreciate that there is a wider agenda. The development of Azerbaijan's non energy sector; structural reforms, human rights and security are among some of the issues on the agenda as the new agreement is finalised. The contribution that the EU can make in all these areas is enormous, as long as Baku has the political will to engage and respond.

Overshadowing the bilateral relations, between the EU and Armenia and the EU and Azerbaijan, is the issue of the Karabakh conflict and its resolution. The EU supports the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair, and articulates its position in terms of those ongoing efforts. That is satisfactory to the sides only to a point. There have been many efforts by both sides to shift the EU position in their favour. The EU's position remains however principled rather than biased, even if the principles sometimes favour one of the sides, and sometimes the other. That is how it is likely to continue. The EU has also the right to have expectations in this regard. It has legitimate interests in being engaged in the process of resolving the Karabakh conflict since the conflict has widespread ramifications for the whole region and beyond. A more positive approach on the part of both Armenia and Azerbaijan on this matter can only be helpful for the overall effort to resolve the conflict.

The European Union is sending a key message to the region, and to those interested in the region. Its engagement with the South Caucasus is ambitious and long lasting. The European Union's friendship and solidarity with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia is unquestionable. Issues in the relations remain. They need to be properly managed and addressed. They certainly should not be allowed to spoil what are clearly mutually beneficial relationships.

source: This is a commentary prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

photo: EU Commissioner for Enlargement, Johannes Hahn with President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan at their meeting in baku on 13 June 2019 (picture courtesy of the press service of the president of Azerbaijan)

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)