Vox populi or Vox dei? Media personalities ask President to change his foreign policy. The voice of the people or the voice of the gods?

Ilham Aliev was on Saturday sworn in as president of Azerbaijan for the third term at a ceremony attended by Government Ministers, officials and diplomats from foreign countries. This followed Presidential elections on 9 October which have been criticised by opposition activists and a number of international observers.

Ahead of the swearing in ceremony four leading Azerbaijani media personalities with views close to that of the Azerbaijani leadership, published an unprecedented open-letter in whch they called on the Azerbaijani President to rethink his foreign policy. In the tightly managed political environment in Azerbaijan such initiatives often have wider significance. In the letter the editors of 1news.az Rahman Haji and of ‘New Baku Post' newspaper Tofig Abbasov, an independent journalist Hamid Hamidov,and prominent artist Akif Melikov, urge President Aliev to reanalyse the directions of Azerbaijan's foreign policy before making any crucial decisions before the Vilnius Summit of Eastern Partnership which is to be held this year.

"We are addressing you this open letter as Azerbaijan received official invitation to the Summit of Eastern Partnership, which is to be held in November in Vilnius as a part of the next meeting of the heads of states of the European Union.There is no doubt that this news triggered some excitement amongst some of our compatriots. However, there are also opposite attitudes related this event as well. Some of our citizens still feel misunderstanding, and even reasonable concerns on the issue."
First of all we need to find an answer to the following question: if we are going to get that close to Brussels, we need to understand - for the sake of what we are going to do that?"

The authors of the open letter question if Europe with its "systematic burden of economic and social problems can really offer Azerbaijan effective ways for further political and economic development."

The letter makes it clear that it has been triggered by the developments of the last weeks.

"The urgency of the issue has increased after the publication of several statements of European officials and institutions that are using didactic tones, gradually increasing the pressure". According to the open letter, real partnership, if it is sound and equitable, requires all parties to respect each other's positions. ‘But the mentoring and didactic tone in the EU - Azerbaijan dialogue, apparently, is transforming into a negative trend that causes concerns and to be blamed on Europe', the letter states. "Europeans, advocating equal partnership, the rule of democratic principles and respect for the rights of all, in practice too often show inexplicable arrogance and unpredictability. It is well known that EU program Eastern Partnership, that we also participate, sets the goals to develop integration ties between the EU and six countries of the former Soviet Union. According to their commitments, Europeans, who initiated the process, have to contribute to 'the creation of the necessary conditions to accelerate political and economic integration between the European Union and interested partner countries' by promoting political and socio-economic reforms in the member states.The priority areas were identified as democracy and stability, economic integration, energy security and the development of contacts between people, including the liberalization of the visa regime. All this would allow Europe to expand their influence to a big part of the former Soviet Union. However, in almost each of the above areas Europeans demonstrate a selective approach, focusing only on aspects of their interest", the letter says.  

The Azerbaijani media personalities say that while the EU does not show the necessary political will in ensuring stability, energy security (e.g. postponing the final decisions of Shah Daniz Phase II agreements) and the development of contacts between peoples, they selectively focus on the issues of democratic development, using inappropriate rhetoric and ignoring positive aspects of the issue.It should be noted that without Azerbaijan, which is the central actor of the Eastern Partnership (EP) initiative, this process will be essentially doomed to oblivion. Azerbaijan's decision to leave Eastern Partnership would provoke a domino effect, which eventually would seriously narrow the scope of European influence in the Eurasian area".

You can read the full report of the open letter in english on the website of news.az here

Commonspace.eu political editor made the following comment

"The open letter of the four Azerbaijani opinion formers looks more like "vox dei" rather than "vox populi" but whatever it is it reflects a view within Azerbaijani ruling circles that has become more acute over the last days as the Azerbaijani leadership deals with criticism of the way it handled the 9 October Presidential election. The message to Europe and the west in general is clear "Shut up or you will lose us".

The major shift in Azerbaijani foreign policy that the four opinion-formers are making in their open letter to President Aliev is unlikely to happen, certainly not in the immediate future, although some unfriendly gesture by Baku towards Europe can be expected. A major change will not happen for three reasons:

First, the present foreign policy is closely linked with Baku's energy policy and despite the occasional glitch this has worked well for Azerbaijan. A major shift in both will take time to implement and is highly risky.

Second, A balanced foreign policy cannot work if there is a sharp swerve in one direction

Third, There are few alternatives for Baku but to pursue its present policies, despite all the posturing. Azerbaijan,and more importantly Azerbaijanis, are not ready for the hug of the bear. The events of recent days in Moscow have reminded Azerbaijanis of many memories, if ever they needed to be reminded.

The letter of the four Azerbaijani opinion formers is unlikely to cause crisis meetings in Brussels over the weekend. But it does reflect a certain view in Baku that needs considering. The EU and the US now need to consider how they are going to engage with the administration of President Aliev in its third term, a re-engagement that needs to be done without compromising principles and values. In the end these relations are of mutual interest, and so both sides are going to have to make the effort. Much will depend on how President Aliev sets out to implement his programme for the third term over the next weeks and months. Further crackdowns by Baku on dissent may prove to be the straw that breaks the camel's back. On the other hand tangible reforms, including long overdue political and constitutional reforms may help both sides turn the page."

source: commonspace.eu with news,az

photo: Four Azerbaijani opinion-formers who sent an open letter to President Aliev.

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)