Sargsyan hails economic successes; slams "neighbour" whilst addressing his National Security Council and Cabinet of Ministers.

Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan has over the last few days held meeting with his National Security Council and with his newly appointed Cabinet of Ministers. The Armenian leader spoke about Armenia's success in the economic sphere in 2012 and lambasted neighbouring Azerbaijan.

 

Speaking to the National Security Council on 5 June, Sargsyan hailed economic growth in 2012. He said:

 

"Today, difficulties are plenty in Armenia. Nobody argues that. However it is also true that the tendencies of Armenia's economic development are promising. In 2012, we registered a 7,2 % economic growth. This high tempo of economic activity is present also in 2013, and this is taking place when inflation is not high and is manageable.

 

Yes, Armenia's economic growth in 2012 exceeded that of all neighboring states. Unlike some of the countries endowed with natural resources, including the neighboring states, in Armenia economic transformation and diversification of economy are truly yielding results. As a result, among 188 countries of the world Armenia in 2012 was the 23rd among the countries with the largest economic growth.

 

This allowed to finally reinstate the pre-crisis situation, while registering growth in all main areas of economy. It was possible to maintain the level of the pre-crisis output and revenues even though the formerly dominating construction area had cut down by almost a half. It means that in the process other areas of economy expanded, their development substituted for and exceeded the output of the construction area bringing forth new areas of production and services, contributing to the establishment of a more robust economic structure. And this is happening when the state revenues have almost doubled. These facts are undeniable and registered not only by us. However it doesn't mean that we should be satisfied or complacent about that. Of course, not.

 

We should restructure our economy, area by area, both in form and content. We are building a new economy. Instead of fighting against the consequences of the hail, we should be able to gradually start the production of the anti-hail systems locally, instead of subsidizing irrigation, we should be able to manufacture the dropping irrigation systems, should be able to commence project which will serve as locomotive for entire areas, for instance to assemble fast and inexpensive greenhouses, starting from the manufacturing of all necessary devices up to, let's say, production of sun batteries. And so on. We must encourage projects like these, and we have already started doing so."

 

Sargsyan also used the meeting to lambast Azerbaijan. He said:

 

"In 3 or 4 years, the picture of the region will be entirely different. We must be ready for that. Experts are expecting Azerbaijan's inevitable fiasco in already two-three years. In perfect line with the dictatorial rules, the authorities of that country are engaged only in serving to its people the image of the Armenian people as their enemy, spreading disgusting notions about us. However social, political and economic mines within Azerbaijan are threatening to explode and do so pretty soon and it looks like they will go off all together. In the face of chronic decline in the production of oil and gas, the leadership of the neighboring country continues to use the acquired revenues in a way which was not conceivable even for their adversaries. Feasting now - this is the logic of their current policies. Revenues are being wasted at the meteoric speed on one-time attractions: huge, eye-popping construction projects, financing of social programs, which they will have to cut tomorrow and wasting billions in different corners of the world for just one night of flattery - activities which those who can see two steps ahead make everything clear.

 

From the other side, the effects of the dictatorship and dictatorial regime are become visible: imprisonment of the opponents, almost total unawareness on the existence of free media, coercion and enormous corruption in that country will double along with the process of decrease of the inflow of petrodollars. I believe nobody doubts that. Two years ago, the young Azerbaijanis were intimidated and silent, however today even if in small groups they've already started talking that the time has come to speak out. Tomorrow is very close; the tomorrow when social networks in that country will be outlawed.

 

I have brought up this topic because the authorities of that country instead of dwelling on their own problems, well being of their own people, building of their own society are busy with "tending to our wounds", are trying to teach us how to live as I've already mentioned through the dissemination of filthy notions about us."

 

The Armenian leader told his Security Council, 

 

"We must carry on with the modernization and diversification of our economy in order to be able to get more favorite conditions in the anticipated restructuring of the region. On this course we may not holdup even for a minute. Holdup is no option."

 

Serzh Sargsyan continued with this theme when he met members of his Cabinet of Ministers on Saturday. He told the Ministers:

 

"Expectations from this government are great, and I don't see any impediment for not working efficiently. On the contrary, I believe that now favorable conditions have been established. We have stated on many occasions that through our work accomplished in the past, we have created the base for a significant breakthrough. The performance of this government will be judged by the results only, strictly by definite results."

 

source: commonspace.eu with the Press Service of the President of Armenia

 

photo: Serzh Sargsyan addressing members of his National Security Council on 5 June 2013. (picture courtesy of the Press Service of the President of Armenia.)

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)