Richard Giragosian: War in Karabakh conflict zone is more than realistic

The recognition of Karabakh's independence by the State of Massachusetts demonstrates the importance of Nagorno-Karabakh to Washington, Head of the Regional Studies Center Richard Giragosian said at a press conference.

He recalled that in June 2012 the State of Rhode Island also adopted a similar resolution on Nagorno- Karabakh. These two resolutions are the evidence of Washington's interest in the Karabakh issue, he said.  The expert also stressed that the Karabakh conflict is of more interest to the United States than the other frozen conflicts.  

When speaking of possible developments in the Karabakh peace process, the expert said that Azerbaijan's aggression and the increase of its military potential create additional tension in the conflict zone. This is a signal for both Armenia and the international community. Giragosian added that the relations between Ankara and Baku, which have recently worsened, also make the situation tense in the region. In this context, the expert thinks that military actions in the  Karabakh conflict zone are more than probable.  

The expert thinks that the OSCE Minsk Group format for the Karabakh  peace process is a deadlock. He said that the OSCE MG is only to maintain the diplomatic aspect of the peace process and to prevent  possible unleashing of military actions. He also stressed that despite the OSCE MG's efforts, the conflicting parties maintain their  own approaches on the basic components of the Karabakh problem.  

As regards the domestic political situation in Nagorno-Karabakh, Giragosian stressed that despite the democratic presidential elections on July 19 2012, the NKR still faces a complicated  socio-economic situation and high-level corruption.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)