Tourism in the Gulf is a game changer

The process of opening-up Saudi Arabia to the world is going on in earnest. As a part of the Vision 2030 blueprint, masterminded by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi government is implementing a plan, which, amongst many other things, aims to turn the Kingdom into a popular tourist destination by the end of the decade.

Other GCC countries, but particularly UAE, Qatar and Oman, also seek a growth in tourism, and see the industry as one of the potential pillars for their post oil economies.

In many countries, tourism is a major economic activity that contributes to economic prosperity. It is also an industry which generates revenues that quickly seep downwards to the very grassroots of society, and so everyone benefits from it. But apart from the economic and financial gains, tourism can also be an instrument of change within societies, opening up conservative, inward looking communities to the outside world. Several Arab Gulf countries have the ambition of turning themselves into major tourist destinations, and some have already considerable success. The potential is great, but there are also some risks.

Dubai led the way

Some have had an early start. Foremost is Dubai, where since the 1960s the ruling al Maqtoum family actively encouraged visitors: first by building a new airport – upgraded and modernised several times since; and second by developing the other necessary infrastructure, such as hotels. “Who is going to stay in all these hotels?” someone asked Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Maqtoum. “Build it and they will come,” he replied. And they did. In their millions and from every corner of the world. Emirates airlines was established in the 1980s. It kept the airport busy, but it was also pivotal in ensuring that tourists could reach Dubai, and that the emirate was not subject to the whims of other carriers.

Image
duabi
Dubai. The Jakarta Post.

After the infrastructure, the product and the brand

Apart from developing its infrastructure from scratch Dubai also had to develop the product. What would tourists do once they get to Dubai? The emirate was creative. It started a series of “festivals”, including a month-long shopping festival. So people started flocking to Dubai for shopping. Big shopping malls were built, and then entertainment areas. A new metro linked the old Dubai with the new one.

All this happened at a time when the region was still – apart from activity around the oil industry – largely in a slumber. The shining lights of Dubai were a lure for people from all over the Gulf and beyond, from the sub continent and from the former Soviet Union, and soon, also for tourists from Europe. Accessing Dubai became easy, compared to other Gulf states thanks to a relaxed visa regime, and this became an additional incentive. Many who came liked it so much they wanted to stay. They started buying flats or villas. Tens of thousands were built in a very short time to satisfy the demand.

Part of the success was Dubai’s ability to develop “ a brand”. Say “Dubai” and what comes first to mind for most people is opulence, a futuristic modern city, and a melange of people, food, cultures and goods. Protecting the brand became an obsession of the al Maqtoum’s. 

Dubai now has competition from places around it who want to copy it, and then do it even better. Dubai risks becoming a bit dated and faded, but this is unlikely to happen as long as Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid is at the helm. He has so far kept Dubai ahead of the curve by being ambitious, creative, and daring. One can only speculate about what his latest ideas for the emirate will be. 

In the meantime however the Dubai trajectory may be one way through which we can understand how tourism will develop in the rest of the Gulf. Qatar, Oman and other parts of the UAE such as Abu Dhabi and Ras al Khaimah also have ambitions to become popular tourist destinations. For the moment the numbers visiting these places are modest. But it is Saudi Arabia’s ambition to become a popular tourist destination that is causing most interest, and for good reason.

Image
qatar
Qatar tourism

Opening up Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia has been visited by millions over centuries. They were practically all pilgrims visiting the Islamic holy sites of Mecca and Medina to perform Hajj. The number of Hajj visitors increased enormously in recent years with the advent of air travel. The Saudi authorities at first struggled to cope, but eventually became very adept at developing the necessary infrastructure, and these days the annual Hajj is run like a military operation. The numbers were also capped, so each country has a quota of how many pilgrims it can send each year. Other sorts of tourism were, until recently, discouraged. Getting a visa for Saudi Arabia was difficult.

In 2019, as part of the modernisation process led by Mohammed bin Salman, a tourist visa was introduced. Covid interrupted the process but it is now back on course. The government’s plans are to make tourism a key driver of the Kingdom’s economy, aiming to contribute to the GDP by more than 10%.  The task to achieve this is enormous and Mohammed bin Salman is a man in a hurry. The infrastructure is being developed at a fast pace.

Developing the product is more difficult. The aim is to develop a number of resorts along the Red Sea coast, mainly for mass tourism, with some other resorts in the interior, such as Al Ula, for the more discerning visitor. In a country that until 2016 shunned all kinds of public entertainment, developing the product is a challenge on an epic scale. More so is the business of developing the brand. Whoever is in charge of developing the Kingdom’s brand must be having a difficult time as they try to reconcile the contradictions in 2023 Saudi Arabia, and package them for a global audience. But you can already see some seeds of success, so by 2030 one can expect that the Kingdom will have a decent tourist product, the infrastructure to support it, and a brand that would be able to project it.

Success will however also depend on the more abstract process of the country’s frame of mind. Most Saudis lived most of their lives in the closed, conservative society that preceded Mohammed bin Salman. Even the thousands who spent time studying or living overseas, quickly returned to the traditional conformity once they were back home. Opening the country for tourism is therefore something on which not all Saudis agree since it is obvious that the impact of mass leisure tourism on Saudi Arabian society is likely to be enormous.

Image
saudi

Keeping everyone safe and secure

The Saudi authorities have a difficult task of maintaining a delicate balance to avoid a backlash from conservative forces, and to ensure the safety and security of visitors. One incident can create havoc, and put years of work and billions of dollars of investment at risk. Everyone can still remember how the Egyptian tourist industry reeled under the threat of violent radical Islamic groups who saw tourism as evil, and tourists as proponents of that evil. Cairo’s iconic Egyptian Museum had to be surrounded like a military fortress, and each hotel had to have an armoured car stationed in front of it. The Saudis are trying very hard to avoid going this way. 

The experience of Dubai may offer some inspiration for a way forward. In defence of his vision for the emirate Mohammed bin Rashid al Maqtoum says that in Dubai there are mosques and there are discos, whoever wants to go to the Mosque can find one very easily, whilst those who want to go to a disco can also do so freely. At the same time the government of Dubai has kept a firm hand on how tourists behaved themselves, and some lines are not to be crossed. Problems arise when those lines are not so clear, and when the unsuspecting guest does not know about them. 

The risk of a backlash against tourism and tourists in Saudi Arabia is real. Tourists should be discreet and respectful, and the government should make its red lines known to tourists. The brand has to complement that. In the end the advent of tourism is part of a larger Saudi effort to modernise and be part of global processes. Striking the right societal balance in the process of doing that will be absolutely necessary. It is right for the Saudi government to be ambitious in its vision, bold in its implementation, and fast in its delivery. With tolerance and respect for different outlooks, and by adopting a common sense approach the transition can be achieved seamlessly and the world can soon start admiring the beauty of Saudi Arabia and the traditions of its people.

source: Dr Dennis Sammut is Managing Editor of commonspace.eu and Director of LINKS Europe based in The Hague. He writes regularly on European and international security issues, the EU’s policy and strategy towards its neighbourhood and Gulf affairs. (director@links-europe.eu).
photo: Vogue Arabia
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)