Opinion: A changing "Organisation of Turkic States"

Until recently, the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) could best be understood in terms of identity, language, culture, and economic collaboration. This is changing.

On September 17, Baku played host to the Fifth Meeting of the Secretaries of the Security Councils of the OTS countries. In his message to the meeting, the president of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev noted that cooperation among the Turkic peoples no longer consisted of political, economic, and cultural matters only but had gained a “long-term strategic nature.” More importantly, he referred to the consultations of the national security councils as a factor facilitating the emergence of a “common security architecture.”

Clearly, it does not mean that the OTS is evolving into a military organization of the NATO kind: there is no commitment of collective defense similar to that of NATO’s Article 5, and there is no evidence of this desire on the part of all members of the organization. Yet, the September meeting means something different: security collaboration within the Turkic context is becoming more regular and operational.

This process has been quite gradual. The OTS started organizing meetings of national security council secretaries since 2022. As at September 2026, the mechanism had attained its fifth meeting. The organization itself considers security cooperation to be an increasingly important area of interest in relation to both conventional and non-conventional threats. This includes such areas as terrorism, transnational organized crime, drug trafficking, extremism, hybrid threats, and critical infrastructure protection.

Recent trends have shown that this does not happen only in one institution. On September 10, the interior ministers of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye and Uzbekistan held talks in Astana in order to enhance cooperation in law enforcement and public security. One day later, the prosecutors generals from the OTS member states convened in Turkistan to discuss ways of enhancing cooperation in issues of justice and security.

Perhaps the following could be even more telling. The second meeting of the heads of defense-industry institutions of OTS member states will be held from September 30 to October 2 in Baku. It will be followed by the OTS foreign ministers' meeting on October 29 and the 13th OTS summit in Türkiye on October 30. And this summit is going to be held amidst the process of developing the organization’s Strategy for 2027–2031, aimed at defining the priorities of the next institutional stage.

All this can be seen as the organization getting an ever more elaborate set of institutions related to security councils, law enforcement agencies, defense industry, diplomacy, infrastructure and economic cooperation. Azerbaijan can be called one of the most active proponents of such evolution. In his speech at the OTS summit in Gabala in October 2025, President Aliyev suggested conducting joint military exercises of the OTS members in Azerbaijan in 2026. He also referred to the extensive military cooperation of Azerbaijan with Türkiye in the form of more than 25 bilateral and multinational exercises held with Ankara in the previous year.

The strategy for Baku is straightforward. Azerbaijan sits at the geographical point where Türkiye and Central Asia meet. The development of the Middle Corridor, closer cooperation through the Caspian Sea, and growing political ties between Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan raise the significance of securing ports, railways, energy pipelines, cybersecurity systems, and maritime routes that link both halves of the Caspian Sea.

Thus, there is an inevitable security aspect to connectivity. As the Trans-Caspian network becomes economically more significant, the cooperation in the fields of security of infrastructure, cybersecurity, organized crime, border security, and crisis response grows ever more vital.

Finally, Turkey’s role is no less important. The country remains the strongest military force in the organization and its sole member of NATO. Its growing military-industrial cooperation with Azerbaijan and the Central Asian countries allows for joint training, technology exchange, and defense production without forming any formal military alliance.

But for the Central Asian states, the emergence of an OTS security dimension should not be viewed either as a decision between Türkiye and Russia or the OTS and existing organizations. First of all, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan operate within the framework of the SCO along with China and Russia, whereas Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan continue to be actively involved in the Russia-led CSTO. The SCO even held its latest summit of leaders in Bishkek on September 1, attended by the heads of Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

And that makes the most appropriate interpretation a diversification, not geopolitical substitution. Traditionally, Central Asian governments have been more favorable towards overlapping partnerships that allow them to preserve their strategic independence. With the help of a more developed OTS, they gain yet another tool for cooperation without renouncing their already established cooperation with Moscow, Beijing, or other Western players.

This explains the importance of the limits of OTS security cooperation. Its five members – Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye, and Uzbekistan – have different security concerns and different relations with major powers. Turkmenistan, meanwhile, continues to stay an observer but not the full-fledged member of the organization, as does Hungary and the Economic Cooperation Organization.

Thus, consensus on terrorism, organized crime, infrastructure protection or defense-industrial cooperation is much easier to achieve than an agreement on collective military commitments. Such a discrepancy might turn out to be an asset rather than a liability.

There is no need for the OTS to transform into yet another defense pact in order to achieve geopolitical importance. Strategic cooperation habits can gradually emerge via regular security officials' conferences, military exercises, defense-industrial cooperation, intelligence sharing, and hybrid threats coordination without imposing treaties which might be unacceptable to some members.

Institutional development of the organization supports such a process. Founded in 2009, OTS currently works through heads-of-state and foreign ministers' councils, a secretariat and an increasing number of affiliated organizations. Its vision Turkic World Vision 2040 strives at coordinating efforts of the members within their international obligations. That is why the September conference in Baku should be taken into account.

The most significant trend does not consist in establishing yet another military alliance. It consists in gradual emergence of a security layer around an already emerging political, economic, and transportation network linking Türkiye, Azerbaijan, and Central Asia.

In light of the impending defense industry conference and the October summit, it seems clear that the OTS will have to be evaluated not only in terms of its identity organization, but also as a strategic coordination mechanism within the broader Turkic world. The shift from identity to security has not yet been completed. However, the institutional base becomes more apparent.

source: Dr Yunus Gurbanov is a Senior Advisor at AIR Centre in Baku.

photo: Heads of the Security Councils of the Organisation of Turkic States met in Baku in September 2026.

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)