Opinion: The Caesar Act: Well-intentioned, but counter-productive

Despite being a diplomatic achievement for the Syrian opposition, the Caesar Act offers only painfully narrow opportunities for progress in the peace process in Syria argues Noman Ahmed in  this op-ed for commonspace.eu 

The recently imposed sanctions on Syria under the Caesar Act garnered multiple responses regionally and internationally. The sanctions take coercive measures against the Syrian regime and its allies due to their involvement in war crimes since the start of the Syrian Civil War. The United States Congress,  the initiators of the Caesar Act, had been reluctant in the past to take escalatory measures against the Syrian regime. However, in 2014, a Syrian fugitive under the  pseudonym "Caesar" released pictures of torture by the Syrian government. "The Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act 2019"  imposes sanctions on the Syrian authorities, its institutions and any collaborators. The Act also urges  the review and improvement of  humanitarian assistance by  international relief bodies. However, despite being a diplomatic achievement for the Syrian opposition, the Caesar Act offers only painful narrow opportunities for progress in the peace process in Syria.

After the adoption of the Caesar Act the Syrian economy quickly started to struggle from the anticipated sanctions. The Syrian Pound (lira) has weakened in value in the weeks since the Act came into force (see table below from The Money Convertor)

 

The Syrian regime  loudly stated that   US sanctions seek to "starve the people". The government   encouraged  its population to use local sources and to sustain their own food production in the light of fewer anticipated food supplies. Syria believes it can survive with support from its allies, notably after Russia and Iran  offered to provide the necessary financial support. Syrian activists critical of the government have also pointed out that sanctions can have little effect on Syrian business magnates with close ties to the regime. In fact, they argued,  the set of restrictions can negatively impact global reconstruction efforts in Syria.

Nonetheless, the United States hopes the sanctions will pressure the regime to change its position on various issues ranging from the economy, the return of refugees, ceasing violent attacks and the release of detainees. On  its part, the Syrian regime  is now trying to manipulate the Caesar Act  into a political and diplomatic tool. The Syrian regime views many refugees as traitors and is not willing to release detainees under the pretext that they could rejoin radical and opposition movements. The United States can afford to wait until the Syrian regime budges under the pressure of the sanctions. On the other hand there is a risk the sanctions will exhaust the average Syrian, long before they impact the well-entrenched government elite.

History has shown that sanctions are often counterproductive. Sanctions on Iraq before 2003 and on Gaza on multiple occasions were not fruitful. Sanctions can also lead to reverse outcomes as anti-western sentiments can multiply. Syria can be no exception to Iraq, Iran or Palestine where anti-west sentiments  grew as a result of political and economic sanctions. The United States is isolating the Syrian regime, but the success of the sanctions depends mainly on the United States' regional allies who will have to enforce the sanctions. In a region where political interests and identity politics influence decision making, the Caesar Act will likely create further polarisation instead of coercing the actors to a political resolution.

Amid what seems to be a largely political game, the Syrian regime is likely to  endure. The sanctions seek to achieve a humanitarian and corrective goal. Still, the Syrian regime stands firm after the defeat of ISIS under a president who demonstrated  an unwavering  capacity for political survival  against all the odds. The regime has already started and is likely to continue to blame the international community for the poor economic and humanitarian situation. In turn, the Caesar Act is expected to hurt  Syrian society, while  hardly denting a regime that keeps being bolstered by a regional network of allies spanning from  Moscow to Tehran.

 

source: Noman Ahmed is Research Associate focusing on Europe's Neighbourhood South at LINKS Europe

photo: A Syrian flag flying over Damascus (archive picture)

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Council of Europe launches new International Claims Commission for Ukraine

Council of Europe launches new International Claims Commission for Ukraine

Thirty-four countries and the European Union have signed a new convention establishing an International Claims Commission for Ukraine at a diplomatic conference co-hosted by the 46-nation Council of Europe and the Netherlands in the Hague. The diplomatic conference was attended by leaders and high-level representatives from over 50 states, including the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, and the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Dick Schoof.  “Today marks a major step forward in ensuring accountability for Ukraine. The International Claims Commission represents justice and hope for tens of thousands of victims—our determination that those who have suffered will not be forgotten. I call for quick ratifications so we can get the commission rapidly up and running for the people of Ukraine,” said Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said: “We expect that every mechanism for compensation from the Register of Damage and Claims Commission to the actual payments – will start working and receive strong and sufficient international support, so that people can truly feel that any kind of damage caused by the war can be compensated. This war, and Russia’s responsibility for it, MUST become a clear example – so that others learn not to choose aggression.” “Accountability is about creating the conditions for peace that endures. And therefore, accountability is a condition of security – today and for the future. But accountability is not only about Ukraine. And it is not only about one aggressor and one victim. Accountability is about Europe. About every country in Europe. It is about whether Europe, as a whole, is willing to defend its peace,” said Maia Sandu, President of the Republic of Moldova, which currently holds the Presidency of the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers. The Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Dick Schoof, said: “Every day Russia is deliberately bombarding homes, destroying businesses and damaging infrastructure in Ukraine. Russia must compensate Ukraine for the damage caused. That is why we have launched the International Claims Commission for Ukraine and we are honoured to host it.” The International Claims Commission will be the second part of a comprehensive compensation mechanism related to Russia’s war of aggression, building on the existing Register of Damage for Ukraine. The claims commission will be established within the framework of the Council of Europe and will also be open to other countries. The Register of Damage for Ukraine, created in 2023, collects and records compensation claims submitted by individuals, organisations and public bodies in Ukraine. Forty-four states and the European Union have so far joined the Register, which has already received 86,000 claims. The International Claims Commission will review, assess and decide upon claims submitted to the Register of Damage for Ukraine and determine the amount of compensation, if any, which is due in each case. The convention establishing the commission will enter into force once it has been ratified by 25 signatories, as long as sufficient funds have been secured to support its initial work.

Popular