OP-ED: Armenian activist Edgar Khachatryan discusses the implications of Armenia's decision to join the Russia led CU.

In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Armenian NGO activist, Edgar Khachatryan discusses the implications of Armenia's decision to join the Russia led Customs Union.

"Those who think there will be another Maidan in Armenia may have such a Maidan in their own backyard", - said Galust Sahakyan, leader of the governing Republican Fraction of the Armenian National Assembly, suggesting Armenian opposition parties not to be too excited about events taking place in other countries.

In order to understand how the Ukrainian developments are viewed in Armenia, first of all we need to understand the current political situation in Armenia; a country that shared over seventy years of Soviet history with Ukraine, but that currently has chosen a different political path.

Not so long ago, in the processes of negotiation over the Association Agreement with the European Union, Yerevan officials used to speak from high platforms about their commitment to signing the Association Agreement at any costs.

The enthusiasm and convincing speeches of the Armenian authorities suddenly disappeared on September 3, 2013 during a meeting with Vladimir Putin, when president Serzh Sargsyan suddenly announced Armenia's "overwhelming desire" to join the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia. Nobody in Armenia could understand precisely whose wish Sargsyan expressed during the meeting, since there had not been neither political nor public discussions held in Armenia on the subject. As people were trying to find an answer to this question, the authorities immediately put their "independent and impartial" media in action to help people understand the situation better and orientate themselves "easily".

For days and nights, these media kept reminding people about the advantages of having a powerful strategic partner in the region, about Russia's role and importance in resisting military aggression from Azerbaijan and Turkey, and about Armenia's happy and "fat" years in the Soviet Union. These beautiful images were occasionally followed by scenes of citizens on Maidan expressing their dissatisfaction with the Ukrainian authorities.

The footage, mainly made up from scenes broadcast by Russian channels, exclusively showed the clashes between activists and "Berkut" troops, and the daunting number of police and civilians injured as a result of the clashes. The videos aired on TV were followed by interviews with analysts, political scientists, and politicians who were diligently trying to prove that Armenia is not Ukraine, and that we Armenians cannot allow bloodshed in our country, a country that has already seen so many tragedies.

As events in Ukraine unfolded, in Armenia, Russia increased activities aimed at promoting the interests of its "brother-country" in more and more visible and obvious ways.

Russia reduced by 30% the price of natural gas for Armenia (a prices difference that is not, however, passed on to the consumer, the ordinary people). According to the authorities, the gas price has been constantly changing since 2011; however, consumer prices in Armenia have been 180 USD per 1000 m3 over all of this period. As a result of this policy, a debt of 300 million USD was accumulated over two years, half of which Russia promised to pay, whereas the other half is supposed to be paid by the Armenian side. During negotiations on this issue, the Armenian government sold the remaining 20% of shares in gas company HayRusGazard to Russia in order to pay the debt.  

The gas deal concerned not only the gas price, but also stated that

1.      The Armenian party guarantees that until December 31, 2043, the rights and interests of Gazprom OJSC, HayRusgazard CJSC and their respective successors arising out of or in connection with the Agreement are not subject to change, amendment, withdrawal or reduction without Russia's consent as of the date of signing the agreement.

2.      The Armenian party guarantees that until December 31, 2043 no laws, decisions, decrees or other legal acts will be changed, cancelled or in any way violate the legal rights and interests of Gazprom OJSC, HayRusgazard CJSC and their respective successors as of the date of signing the agreement.

In reality, the gas deal conceals a different kind of agreement between the Armenian authorities and Russia: up to December 2043, Russia insures unrestricted falsified elections and impunity towards such exercises. That is to say, Russia insures that it will not allow changes of power in Armenia until December 2043, as this would contradict Russian interests. Thus it appears that, in order to protect its own interests, Putin's regime protects the position and interests of the Armenia's ruling elite.

At the Forum of Russian Compatriots in Yerevan, Russian ambassador to Armenia Ivan Volinkin announced that Russia will halt any attempts at "aggressive intervention of other countries in the domestic affairs of its friendly states in an effort to instill ideas alien to our mind and soul". In other words, Moscow simply declares its rights to intervene in Armenia's internal affairs, or announces that any coup attempts in Armenia "initiated" or supported by a third country will be crushed by Russia.

Crimea

The reaction from the majority of Armenian citizens to the developments taking place between Russia and Ukraine over the Autonomous Region of Crimea is of particular interest. The announcement of a referendum on the issue of the political status of Crimea aroused strong feelings of empathy among Armenians towards the ethnic Russian population of the autonomous region.

It was clear that the phrase "right to self-determination", formulated by the Russian and repeated by the Armenian propaganda machine could not leave people in Armenia indifferent. There is hardly any Armenian who would argue with or question the importance and predominance of the principle of self-determination. Since the Armenian viewpoint on the Nagorno Karabakh conflict is that the Armenians in NK also have the right to self-determination, immediately Crimea was referred to as a "Russian Karabakh". The stream of articles produced by the Russian propaganda about illegal and violent activities by extremists and Bandera-adepts against the Russian population in Crimea stirred more and more compassion among the Armenian viewers towards a people who, as most would see it, were now "sharing the bitter fate of the Armenians".

During the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) plenary session on Crimea, the Armenian delegation voted against the resolution that called for sanctions against Russia.

"If the point is that territorial integrity should prevail while the right to self-determination will rely only on the consent of the central authorities, then, in this case, regardless of whether our relations with Russia are friendly or not, our position is clear and it is in our national and state interests", commented David Harutyunyan, Head of Armenian Delegation to PACE.

The few civil society groups in Armenia that considered Russia's actions towards Crimea as annexation that should not be left unpunished were once more labeled traitors to the nation and secret agents prepared by the West, trying to undermine the foundation of the Armenian state with their actions.

Russia's role in Armenia

According to David Shahnazaryan, head of the "Concord" Center and former head of the National Security Ministry, the Armenian authorities, Parliament (with the exception of some MPs), analysts, certain civil groups, criminal elements, and oligarchs in fact all together make up a system that is fully governed by Kremlin, and this system is actually responsible for the current situation in Armenia, leaving no chance for change in this country. "The Armenian government is formed in Russia. Armenian foreign policy is shaped in Russia. The Republic's security system is formed in Russia. This is accepted by everyone", -says Mr. Shahnazaryan.

Russia is always seen as a protector of Armenia. So, what do we gain from the Russian military presence in our country, that is so valued by many people? From the point of view of security, the gain may be more a psychological than a practical one. Many people think that the presence of Russian troops is a restrictive, preventive factor for Turkey or Azerbaijan. It may guarantee security from possible attacks, since attacks on a Collective Security Treaty Organization's* member state would be viewed as an attack on Russia. For Russia, in the meantime, this is a warrant to restore its former dominant position in the South Caucasus.

Thus, the kind of policy Russia is implementing towards Armenia (for instance, when it continues to sell arms to Azerbaijan, or when it uses and will continue to use Armenia as a tool to destabilize the region when necessary), is almost not being discussed.

Economy

Today, many objects of great significance and strategic importance for Armenia are under Russian control: HayRusgazard, Electric Networks of Armenia, Hrazdan Thermal Power Plant, Metsamor Nuclear Power Plant, the Armenian Railways, telephone company Armentel... The list goes on, but it is important to understand the fact that Russia has enormous leverage to influence both the internal and external policies of Armenia and make it even more dependent on Russia.

The relations between Russia and Armenia are similar to a "forced friendship", with the potential to turn into a lord-vassal relationship at any moment; and the characterization "Strategic alliance" may lose its relevance at any time. After the Ukrainian events, it should be clear to everyone what the combined authorities of Putin and Sargsyan are capable of in case there is an attempt of a power change in Armenia.

Touching upon the current political discourse in Armenia, it must be noted that Maidan and Ukrainian developments are presented to the society as an anti-Russian processes initiated by Western countries. This is the sign of an old conflict between Russia (Soviet Union) and Western world and this is the reason why the Armenian society is forced to view anyone with a different mentality as an enemy. A huge segment in Armenian society considers joining the Customs Union in order to join Russia's efforts in resisting Western pressure and aggression.  

On Tuesday April 29 Armenia was supposed to officially sign the agreement of joining the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC) **. When reading the PR booklets of the Customs Union advertising the benefits of the Armenia in case it joins the Customs Union, one can see that Armenia is promised a number of benefits: solution of the unemployment issues, custom free import of goods from Customs Union countries; upgrading roads and railways, and even economic stabilization of Nagorno Karabakh.

In fact the booklet touches upon the topics that are very actual for the population that is barely surviving in quite difficult social and economic conditions.

Benefits of Custom Union

It seems that nobody in Armenia is able to critically analyze the situation and to ask very simple and logical questions, such as how Russia will develop Armenia's economy if all Russian economy is based on its energetic resources. In fact Russia has no other industry except for the arms industry. This means that the only thing that Armenia can be involved in is the arms industry. There is hardly any other sphere that Russia can develop in Armenia, because all the other spheres of great importance in Armenia are already under Russian control and had no influence on the economical sustainability of the country. There has been no public discussion that would raise questions such as whether Armenia imports anything from Belarus or Kazakhstan, or what is the percentage of the import from Russia in comparison with the import from other countries? It seems nobody really asks such questions, because if such questions are raised it will become clear that the percentage of import from Russia is so small that it does not positively affect Armenia.

Georgia

For some unknown reasons currently in Armenia people believe that Russia or the integration in the Customs Union will take Armenia out of the blockade and will open its roads and railways. It is unclear how Russia will do that if the closest neighbor of Armenia is Georgia with which Russia has almost no affairs. Armenia and Russia do not have common borders, thus any communication will be interrelated with Armenia's neighbor countries. In addition, Georgia chose to join the Association Agreement with European Union, so very soon the custom policies and legislations will be incompatible. This fact creates even more obstacles and challenges for Armenia's collaboration and cooperation with its closest neighbors. 

How can Russia take Armenia out of the blockade if one of the reasons for such blockade is Russia and its relations with Armenia's neighbor countries? Armenia's railway to Russia is blocked because besides going through Georgia the railway goes through the territory of Abkhazia too. Since the issue over Abkhazia is still unsolved between Russia and Georgia, in fact the promise of railway development is unrealistic.

It seems like a political mockery that a country involved in the Minsk group process as an independent mediator helping the Nagorno Karabakh conflict parties to solve the issue in a peaceful way, promises an economic development for Nagorno Karabakh in case Armenia joins the Customs Union.

These points are only mentioned in a small PR booklet, and more promises of these kind are expected in the future.

Armenians do not pay attention to the fact how the human rights issues will be solved in the Customs Union, by comparing the situation in the countries that are currently within the Customs Union. If one looks at any human rights related reports, one can see that Russia and Belarus are in the lowest positions in terms of human rights protection, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc. And now Armenia has chosen to join these countries.

Only a small number of people are interested what will happen as a result of a so called "friendship" and realize that this risks the existence of civil society in Armenia and the participation of the people in the decision making processes.

Thus, in case Armenia joins the Customs Union it makes no sense to even talk about democracy in Armenia. Unfortunately, the Armenian government and through propaganda now also the Armenian society seems to be ready to pay with its sovereignty, freedom and democratic values for some promises of a pseudo economic development and security. This is the nearest future of Armenia in case there is no protest from the broader segments of the society. Unfortunately these painful realities are hidden behind the romantic memories of Soviet Union, and, unfortunately, mainly the younger generation is indifferent towards such romantic Soviet Union memories. The only hope that there will be a change in Armenia is that it will come with the new generation, who hopefully has this potential and desire for changes.

 


In 1992, six post-Soviet states belonging to the Commonwealth of Independent States-Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan-signed the Collective Security Treaty. Three other post- Soviet states-Azerbaijan, Belarus, and Georgia-signed the next year and the treaty took effect in 1994. Five years later, six of the nine-all but Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan-agreed to renew the treaty for five more years, and in 2002 those six formally agreed to create the Collective Security Treaty Organization as a military alliance.

**On Monday April 28, the Armenian branch of Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty http://www.azatutyun.am/ has published an article "Sarkisian Shuns Customs Union Summit". According to the article president Sarkisyan will not attend Tuesday's summit of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan that was expected to complete Armenia's accession to their Customs Union, it emerged on Monday. Meantime, Foreign Ministry spokesman Tigran Balayan said that the Armenian government will continue to implement a "roadmap" to joining the Customs Union, which was agreed with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan last December.

Edgar Khachatryan is the Founder and Director of Peace Dialogue, an NGO based in Vanadzor, Armenia. www.peacedialogue.am. He contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu.

Photo: Demonstrators in Yerevan protest against the government's decision to abandon plans to enter into an Association Agreement with the EU during the visit of President Putin to Armenia in December 2013.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.

Popular