China dabbles in Horn of Africa but its ability to bring peace to the region is minimal

Beijing’s special envoy for the Horn of Africa, Xue Bing, told a regional conference attended by eight governments from the region that ‘all parties should engage in dialogue’ to achieve common prosperity. In the meeting China reaffirmed its support for peaceful development in the Horn of Africa, saying it would “actively engage” in regional initiatives to promote the concept.

But analysts and observers are very skeptical. Whilst China might dabble with the region and its many problems, it ability to impact the situation, and particularly contribute to resolving the conflicts that plague the region is minimal.

In his speech at the Kampala Conference, Xue said Beijing would offer military assistance and training, as well as helping to develop the region’s infrastructure and boosting trade.

“The world today faces overlapping risks and challenges that threaten peace and development in the Horn of Africa, and all parties should engage in dialogue and cooperation to maintain universal security and achieve common prosperity,” Xue told the event, according to the Chinese foreign ministry.

Xue outlined further areas of cooperation, including counterterrorism and landmine eradication, while stressing China’s support for “African-led solutions” through platforms such as the African Union and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development.

At the China-led conference, which brought together regional countries including Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan and Uganda, Xue declared that “China is committed to actively engage with regional countries in various initiatives that promote peace and development.”

Under its Belt and Road Initiative, China has funded and built huge infrastructure projects in the region, including a railroad from the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa to Djibouti.

Through its “peaceful development” concept for the Horn of Africa, China promotes economic development as a solution to problems in the region. It sees support for development and avoidance of direct involvement in these disputes as less risky and less likely to make enemies for China.

But, given the complex nature of conflicts in the region, such as the civil wars in Sudan and Ethiopia, analysts said China was likely to avoid direct intervention.

Xue was appointed in 2022 to help broker peace in the region, which includes China’s first overseas military base in Djibouti.

At the Kampala event, Xue said China was ready to negotiate and sign the Agreement on China-Africa Economic Partnership for Shared Development.

China also recently unveiled a plan to expand zero-tariff treatment for all African countries except for eSwatini, with which it does not have diplomatic relations.

“China will also encourage more Chinese enterprises to invest in the region, increase the added value of their products and localisation to boost economies and create jobs,” Xue said, according to Uganda’s foreign ministry.

At the opening ceremony, John Mulimba, Uganda’s minister of state for foreign affairs, thanked the Chinese government for its strong cooperation with Africa to promote peace and sustainable development, and for supporting a regional dialogue framework that emphasised African leadership.

Analysts said while Beijing’s attempts to link economic development to stability had helped frame its approach to the region, there were limitations to what it could do to solve the region’s conflicts.

David Shinn, a professor at George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs, doubted whether China had the “expertise, resources, or even the will” to do so. He was quoted by the South China Morning Post as saying that “China has used most of these tools in the Horn of Africa in the past and they have had minimal impact”. “Whatever China can do to mitigate conflict in the Horn of Africa is welcome, but history suggests we should be realistic concerning the results.”

There are currently multiple conflicts in the Horn of Africa, and most countries that were present in the Kampala conference are affected.

Source: commonspace.eu with South China Morning Post (Hong Kong) and agencies.

Photo: The China led conference on the Horn of Africa held in Kampala at the end of July 2025 (picture courtesy of South China Morning Post, Hong Kong).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

The ''Coalition of the  Willing''  of thirty five countries, has renewed its support of Ukriane, at a meeting in Kyiv, held on Ukraine's national day on 24 August, under the chairmanship of British Prime Minister,A ndy Burnham. Burnham has promised to keep up the pressure on Russia despite Moscow's "outrageous threats", on his first official visit to Ukraine as UK prime minister. Burnham met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing", set up by the UK and France under his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer. He said the coalition was "doing everything we can" while urging the US Congress to "ratchet up" economic pressure on Russia. The government has agreed to hand over blueprints for British-made components for the Scalp missile, a French version of the UK's Storm Shadow cruise missile - allowing Ukraine to produce the long-range weapon domestically. During the meeting with France and Ukraine, Burnham said allies were doing "everything we can" to "dig into our own stocks and help others dig into their stocks" of air defences to protect Ukraine. "This is the moment to keep up the pressure on Russia, the moment to squeeze their ability to fund this illegal war," Burnham said, praising the "strength" of the Ukrainian people. "Ukraine has been Europe's protector, not a drain on our security but the front line in keeping Europe safe." It comes after Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised the UK's decision to share the missile blueprints. Peskov said it prevented "even the slightest progress" towards achieving peace. He told reporters on Monday that the Russian military was already gathering data to locate any missile production sites to destroy them. "Britain is involved in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime. Britain methodically and regularly adds fuel to the fire," he added. In response, Burnham said: "Who started the fire? That's the question, isn't it?" He added the issue of missile interceptors would be the main topic at the coalition of the willing meeting. Burnham chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing" in Kyiv Burnham has been reaffirming the UK's backing for Kyiv in the wake of escalating Russian strikes on Ukraine in recent weeks - including one on a shopping centre on Friday that killed at least 16 people. In a joint statement after the meeting, Burnham and co-chairs French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the group would aim to strength Kyiv's air defences "as a matter or urgent priority". They also condemned Moscow's "systemic and escalating strikes against Ukraine's cities, critical infrastructure and civilians" and pledged to "constrain Russia's war chest through sanctions and actions against the "shadow fleet". (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)