Monday Commentary: Europe still needs the OSCE

The Ministerial Council of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) will have its annual meeting in Vienna on 4-5 December. Foreign Ministers from the 57 member states, which also include the United States and Canada, and the Central Asian republics, and 11 partner countries, will congregate to discuss the future of European Security at a time when many believe that war in Europe over the next decade is likely. Ukraine is just a rehearsal for Russia’s ultimate ambitions.

British diplomacy used to describe the OSCE as “the organization to manage Russia”. It has not done a good job of that, but this task remains paramount.

The Ministerial Council will be the last major business of this year’s chairmanship, Finland, and will launch the new Chairmanship for 2026, Switzerland.

The OSCE has been moribund for some time, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, nearly ended it. But Europe still needs the OSCE, and there is hope that it will take a new lease of life in 2026.

The Helsinki Final Act

On its website, the OSCE says that it “works for stability, peace and democracy, through political dialogue on shared values and joint action. The basis for this is the principles agreed in the 1975 Helsinki Final Act and subsequent political decisions.” 2025 was the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Final Act, which many in Europe see not only as the symbol of peace in Europe, but also as the beacon for the future. The Helsinki Final Act, adopted on 1 August 1975, “was a settlement on the territorial integrity of European states during the Cold War. But more than that, it linked the security of the international system with environmental sustainability, economic opportunity, and human rights. Agreement was forged on the 'freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,' and provided for equality for national minorities.”

For the OSCE to remain relevant it must remain inspired by that Act, but must accept that the present reality is different, and forge a new trajectory.

The last two Chairmanships of the OSCE, Malta in 2024 and Finland in 2025 were largely stop-gap efforts. Their job was mainly to keep the OSCE alive and intact at a time when the very existence of the organisation was in question. In this, they largely succeeded, but now there are expectations that the Swiss in 2026 can launch a new beginning. It will not be easy.

Switzerland has held the OSCE Chairmanship twice before, successfully. It has the experience, a wide network of embassies, and an able team in Bern, to successfully start what is likely to be a long and laborious journey. The new Chairman-in-office is Swiss Federal Foreign Minister Councillor, Ignazio Cassis. Cassis is also the current Vice President of the Swiss Confederation, and is fluent in Italian, English, German and French.

Quite unusual also is the fact that currently the General Secretary of the OSCE is a Turk. Feridun Sinirlioğlu is an experienced Turkish diplomat, who has held the position for a year. Between them, Cassis and Sinirlioğlu will have to craft out the new OSCE, but in the end, it will largely depend on the will of the member states, including Russia.

The Ministerial Council

Finland decided not to follow precedent, and not hold the Ministerial Council in Helsinki. According to the OSCE, “the decision to hold the Ministerial Council in Vienna instead of Helsinki reflects a commitment to reducing travel-related burdens for participating States and the Secretariat and minimising the environmental impact of the event.” However, the Finns probably also wanted to avoid the embarrassment of having to host Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, in their capital. Lavrov has in the past put a lot of obstacles in the path of the OSCE, but he also does not want to break it. The Russians are comfortable with the consensus rule of the OSCE, and they will drag their feet. So, progress on any issue will inevitably be slow. But the OSCE Ministerial Meeting will give an indication of Russia’s intentions, even if they are likely to be subtle signs.

Most of the time in the Ministerial Council will be taken by set-piece speeches by the 57 ministers, an opportunity for countries to set their stall. But behind-the-scenes meetings will take place which are more substantial.

This year will see Armenia and Azerbaijan for the first time since the early 1990s sitting not as enemies, even though not exactly as friends yet. The Ministerial Council will finally put an end to the ominous Minsk Group. The fact that the OSCE in the end played no part in ending the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict is a failure from which lessons need to be learnt.

A new, reborn, OSCE, must understand that its core task remains European peace and security. It should resist the temptation of “looking busy” with a lot of secondary things. After peace and security return to Europe, it can consider other tasks. But we are far away from that yet.

Source: Monday Commentary is written every week by Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe and Managing Editor of commonspace.eu

Photo: Soviet leader, Leonid Brezhnev, signing the Helsinki Final Act on 1 August 1975.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan strengthens its relations with China and US

Uzbekistan strengthens its relations with China and US

In recent days, Uzbekistan welcomed the Chinese and American governments in quick succession. During Chinese Premier Li Qiang’s visit on 17-18 October, the Uzbek presidential administration said that joint projects backed by firm agreements had reached nearly $60 billion. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio then arrived in Samarkand for C5+1 talks, accompanied at the time by American business leaders seeking contracts, particularly in critical minerals. During the visit, Uzbekistan announced 54 agreements covering trade, investment, and technology. The agreements are said to be worth a total of $12 billion, according to Uzbekistan’s Ministry of Investment, Industry and Trade. However, China still accounts for 23% of Uzbekistan’s foreign trade in January-August 2026, while US goods trade with Uzbekistan totalled at $1.05 billion in 2025, which is less than a fifteenth of the value of its trade with China. Rubio said Washington was not asking Central Asian countries to stop cooperating with other partners, but would instead compete for investment. Tashkent is likely to welcome investment from both sides, but the trade gap shows how challenging it will be if it were to decrease its dependence on Beijing. “Chinese Premier Li Qiang visited Uzbekistan on October 17–18, just ahead of United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who arrived in Samarkand on October 18 with a delegation of American business leaders seeking new contracts. While China already has a substantial presence in Uzbek manufacturing and energy, Washington is seeking to expand American involvement in critical minerals and technology. The visits highlight the growing competition between the world’s two largest economies for influence in Central Asia. On October 17, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev received Li Qiang. According to the Uzbek presidential administration, the portfolio of joint projects backed by firm agreements has reached nearly $60 billion. More than 6,000 joint ventures with Chinese participation have been established in Uzbekistan. (...) Construction of the China–Kyrgyzstan–Uzbekistan railway was another topic of discussion. Work officially began in December 2024. The route will cross mountainous areas of Kyrgyzstan and connect the railway networks of China and Uzbekistan. The 304-kilometer section through Kyrgyzstan alone is estimated to cost $4.7 billion and will require 50 bridges and 29 tunnels. (...) On October 19, Rubio attended talks in Samarkand under the C5+1 format, bringing together the U.S. and Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Rubio said nearly 300 American businesses were represented in Samarkand. Companies were discussing agreements potentially worth billions of dollars, with concrete announcements expected following the meetings. Among Washington’s priorities are critical minerals used in advanced technologies, including electronics and batteries.”

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)