Zelenskyy Warns Wartime Elections Could “Split Ukraine”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has firmly rejected calls for elections while Russia’s full-scale war continues, warning on Sunday (August 23) that a wartime vote could destabilise and divide Ukraine. “If we want to destroy the country, then during a war like this we can move toward elections,” Zelenskyy told reporters. He described elections under current conditions as “a tsunami for the state” that would split the country.

The comments were Zelenskyy’s first response to a call for elections by former Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, who was dismissed in July. In a video address published on YouTube on August 18, Fedorov argued that Ukraine should develop a “legal, safe, and realistic mechanism” to restore the democratic process despite the prolonged war. He acknowledged that any vote would need to address major obstacles, including the participation of soldiers, Ukrainians living abroad, and residents of frontline areas, as well as the security of polling and public confidence in the result.

Zelenskyy said an election could only be considered if conditions allowed it to be conducted safely, legitimately and democratically. This would require ensuring participation by military personnel, residents of frontline areas and millions of Ukrainians abroad, while protecting voters from Russian attacks. He said Ukraine’s international partners had not presented a concrete plan capable of meeting these requirements.

Ukraine has not held a presidential election since 2019, when Zelenskyy won 73 per cent of the vote against incumbent Petro Poroshenko. Although his five-year term was scheduled to end in May 2024, elections are prohibited under Ukrainian law while martial law remains in force. Martial law was introduced following Russia’s full-scale invasion on February 24, 2022.

The debate has also drawn international attention. U.S. President Donald Trump criticised Ukraine’s lack of elections in December 2025, arguing that Ukrainians “should have that choice.” Zelenskyy previously responded that he could hold an election within 60 to 90 days if the United States and European allies helped guarantee the security of the process.

The election dispute comes amid a broader rupture between Zelenskyy and Fedorov. The president said the former minister had become involved in a serious conflict with military commander Oleksandr Syrskyi over the relationship between the Defense Ministry and the military command. Fedorov’s dismissal has then triggered widespread protests in Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities: on July 16 only, more than 1,000 people reportedly gathered outside Zelenskyy’s office to demand his reinstatement. However, his recent call for elections also drew criticism from some soldiers and protesters who had supported his return. Fedorov has not explicitly stated whether he would run in a future presidential election.

Source: commonspace.eu with Kyiv Independent (Kyiv) and The Epoch Times (New York).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

Government forces in Ethiopia, have taken control of the town of Mekelle, capital of the Tigray region. Earlier, Ethiopia's federal military said it had recaptured the main airport in the capital of the northern Tigray region, dealing a major setback to an ​opposition alliance in its stronghold. Clashes pitting a rebel alliance led by Tigray's ruling party ‌against the government and its allied forces broke out in northern Ethiopia last week, in the most serious escalation of violence since a 2020-2022 civil war. The fighting has stoked fears that it could escalate into a wider regional conflict, potentially drawing in neighbouring ​countries in the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. In recent days Ethiopia and Eritrea broke off diplomatic relations amid mutual accusations. In Washington, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott ​said the United States strongly urged Ethiopia and Eritrea to "exercise maximum restraint and return ⁠to dialogue and cooperation as agreed in their 2018 peace framework." "The Horn of Africa cannot sustain another ​military conflict and humanitarian crisis," Pigott said. "A conflict jeopardizes ongoing U.S. collaboration on shared interests with both countries." The ​federal government in Addis Ababa accused Eritrea of supporting the rebel alliance alongside Sudan and Egypt. The three countries deny this. Troops from the Ethiopian National Defence Forces had regained control of Alula Aba ​Nega Airport in Tigray's capital Mekelle,   A Mekelle resident who asked not to be named for security reasons, confirmed the ‌taking of ⁠the airport by government forces and added they could hear gunfire outside the city centre. This source said they had seen some Tigrayan Defence Force fighters abandoning their posts and heading home, and that there was looting of government facilities taking place in the city. Mekelle's airport, which ​is around 10 km (6 miles) from the centre of the city, was ​one of three ⁠airports in the region that were seized by the opposition forces at the start of the fighting on September 23. The taking of Mekelle by government forces would be a major setback for the opposition alliance, although analysts say ⁠it ​would be unlikely to end the conflict. In 2020, federal forces captured ​Mekelle within the first month of the two year war before the TPLF reclaimed it seven months later.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)